Monday 2 July 2012

4 Cambodian temples that aren't Angkor Wat

The square stone walls, lion sculptures and octagonal towers of Sambor Prei Kuk are fighting a losing battle against the jungle.
Unlike the UNESCO site at Siam Reap, you can have these ancient beauties all to yourself

At the turn of the millennium, when Cambodia was still reeling from decades of civil war, one could spend hours walking around Angkor Wat Archaeological Park without seeing a single foreigner.
But Cambodia today -- and the 12th-century temple complex that sits at its geographic, historic and spiritual heart -- is awash with tourists.

More than 640,000 visited in the first three months of 2012, with archaeologists claiming the UNESCO World Heritage Site is being loved to death.
Yet there are dozens of Angkor-era temple complexes in Cambodia that receive a fraction of the visitors Angkor Wat gets, some of which you can have all to yourself.
These are four of the most impressive. 

Phnom Chissor 


Start training now. To get to the top of Phnom Chisor, visitors have to climb 412 steps.
Set on a hill not far from Phnom Penh, with knockout views of the fertile deltas and emerald green rice fields of Cambodia’s deep south, this small but impressive Hindu temple predates Angkor Wat by 100 years.
It’s also where the party scene in Matt Dillon’s 2002 thriller "City of Ghosts" was filmed.
The old monks who live here are especially friendly, as are the neighborhood kids who’ll gladly take you down the ancient staircase to see the ruins of two additional sandstone temples built on the flats.
Getting there: Hire a taxi and driver for a half-day trip to Phnom Chissor for about US$20.
Alternatively, hire a moped for US$5 a day and follow Highway No, 2 south to Takeo. Turn left just before the 52-kilometer mark and follow the dirt road for four kilometers to the base of a hill. Entrance fee is US$2.

More on CNNGo: 12 stylish boutique hotels in Cambodia


Sambor Prei Kuk


The centerpiece of Sambor Prei Kuk is a gigantic three-sided, serenely smiling face, much like the one adorning the famous Bayon temple of Angkor Wat.
The site of the ancient kingdom of Chenla, this 1,400-year-old city is home to a whopping 140 temples and monuments.
Without the maintenance crews that sanitize Angkor Wat, the square stone walls, shiva lingmans, lion sculptures and octagonal towers of Sambor Prei Kuk are fighting a losing battle against the jungle.
But that adds to the rawness of exploring it and also keeps the masses away.
For those seeking an Indiana-Jones experience in Cambodia, Sambor Prei Kuk is it.
Getting there: The nearest town, Kampong Thom, lies roughly half way between Phnom Penh and Siem Reap. Motorbike taxis from Kampong Thom’s central market take about two hours to reach the ruins 30 kilometers to the north. Expect to pay US$5-10 per person.

Koh Ker


Until 2004, Koh Ker was extremely difficult to reach, but a road linking it to Siem Reap has put it on the map. 
Built in the 10th century, this lost city was the Angkorian kings' last seat of power before they relocated to Angkor Wat and met their demise.
There are about 50 temples at Koh Ker, most of which remain ensconced in jungle.
The two most impressive are Red Temple, named after the color of the bricks and home to King Jayavarman IV’s old thrown room; and Kohmpang (Prasat Thom), a dazzling 65-meter-high semi-pyramidal temple structure and replica of mythical Mount Meru. 

Getting there: Kok Ker lies 130 kilometers north of Siem Reap. Taxis charge anywhere from US$50-100 for a day trip, with fares depending on the state of the vehicle. Air-conditioning, four-wheel drive and working suspension cost more but are definitely worth it.
Entry is US$10.

There are a few basic food stands in front of Prasat Thom here but no accommodation, so you'll need to bring a tent or hammock if you want to stay the night and get the most out of the arduous journey.
More on CNNGo:  Sustainable luxury on Song Saa

Phreah Vihear


The 900-year-old Preah Vihear has belonged to Cambodia since a 1962 World Court ruling, but ownership remains disputed by many Thais.
Atop a 525-meter-high cliff in the Dangkrek Mountains demarcating the border between northern Cambodia and Thailand, Preah Vihear (or Prasat Phra Viharn to the Thais) is claimed by the governments of both countries.
 Their war of words escalated into a troop buildup when the site received UNESCO World Heritage Listing in 2008 and tourists were banned from visiting.

The most recent hostilities in 2011 saw a wing of the main temple destroyed by artillery fire.
While the situation remains tense this year, Preah Vihear is once again open to visitors.
Built between the 9th and 12th centuries, its stone buildings and courtyards are spread across several levels interconnected by ancient stairways. They lead to an eagle’s nest precipice, where the view into Cambodia seems to stretch out forever.


Getting there: Preah Vihear lies 200 kilometers north of Siem Reap. The going is slow, so you may want to stay the night at a guesthouse in the nearby town of Anlong Veng.
When your taxi reaches the bottom of the cliff, you’ll need to pay US$5 at the ticket. The fee includes box a motorbike ride up the steep winding road to the temple.

Note: the entrance at the Thai side of the temple has been closed since 2010.
Ian Lloyd Neubauer is a Sydney-based freelance journalist specializing in adventure travel. He has reported extensively across East Asia and the South Pacific and is the author of two travel novels, Getafix (2004) and Maquis (2006), which is being turned into a feature film in consultation with Fox Studios.

Read more about Ian Lloyd Neubauer

University candidates flock to capital for entrance exams

HA NOI – University candidates from the provinces have descended on Ha Noi to sit entrance exams, which start tomorrow.

The number of coaches arriving and departing My Dinh, Giap Bat, Nuoc Ngam, Luong Yen terminals have increased sharply over the last few days, causing traffic jams in surrounding roads, particularly Pham Hung and Giai Phong.
Tran Trong Thai, from the northern province of Thai Binh, whose son is hoping to go to university this year, said he'd never seen buses to Ha Noi so crowded.
"I had to stand for the whole journey, which is more than 100km, because there were no seats available," he said.

Meanwhile, to ensure the examinations are conducted in an orderly fashion, the Ministry of Education and Training recently promulgated Circular 24.
Under the circular, candidates are not allowed to take cameras, tape recorders and other electronic equipment into examination halls. Those breaking the rules will be barred from sitting the exam or have their papers marked.

Students have been asked to report those suspected of cheating to the ministry's university entrance exam steering committee, universities' enrolment boards or education inspectors within seven days.
Officials said whistle-blowers' identities would be protected.
Meanwhile, Ha Noi Police have banned lorries exceeding one tonne and coaches with more than 30 seats from 40 roads in the city during peak hours.
Roads with traffic bans include Dai La, Minh Khai, Giai Phong, Truong Chinh, Tay Son and Nguyen Luong Bang.

The university entrance exam has been divided into four groups. Group A, which run from tomorrow to Thursday, is for candidates sitting maths, physics and chemistry.

B Group will be for those sitting maths, chemistry and biology, while C Group will be for those planning to study literature, history and geography. Meanwhile, D Group, for those sitting maths, literature and foreign languages, will run from Sunday to next Tuesday.
The last stage of the college entrance exam will take place on July 15-16. – VNS

Cambodia ripe for more exports

HCM CITY — Cambodia offers plenty of oppor-tunities for Vietnamese exporters although there is intense competition from countries such as Thailand and China, delegates said at a conference in HCM City last Thursday.
 
Le Quoc Phong, general director of the Binh Dien Fertiliser Group, said the Cambodian market had been familiar with fertilisers imported from Thailand and China. Therefore, the company faced difficulties in the initial step of penetrating the market.
Thanks to providing training courses for its sale agents as well as farmers, the company had gradually won consumers' confidence in its products. As a result, sales had increased strongly in recent years, Phong said.

He said last year the company earned US$50 million from the export of 90,000 tonnes of fertilisers to the Cambodia market. It expects to export130,000 tonnes of fertilisers worth $70 million this year.
Kao Sieu Luc, general director of ABC Bakery, also said Cambodia had very high export potential, but "we must understand consumers' taste and produce suitable products."
The company's revenue from the Cambodian market went up more than 40 per cent year on year, Luc told the conference organised by the Business Study and Assistance Centre.
He said the company planned to open 10 bakery shops in the coming time.
It also planned to build a bakery factory in the market.

Tang Quang Trong, sales director in Indochina region of Dai Dong Tien Corporation, said Cambodia was also a large market for Vietnamese plastic products for which Thailand posed stiff competition. Hence the company had focused on improving their products' quality and expanding its distribution system.

Currently the company enjoyed very good sales in Cambodia, Trong said, adding that it planned to construct a warehouse there as part of its expansion plan.
He said Vietnamese products exported to Cambodia must have labels in English.
Le Xuan Khue, deputy chairman of the Vietnamese High-Quality Products Business Association, said the association would organise a five-day trade fair of Vietnamese high-quality goods and exports in Cambodia from August 9-13.

The 10th edition of the fair would be a good chance for Vietnamese firms to reinforce their brands in the Cambodian market, Khue said, adding more than 150 Vietnamese businesses would take part in the event. — VNS

CAMBODIA: Respect ideals and concepts


FOR PUBLICATIONAHRC-ETC-018-2012

July 1, 2012

An article by Dr. Gaffar Peang-Meth published by the Asian Human Rights Commission
CAMBODIA: Respect ideals and concepts, not arbitrary leaders

The West and the East historically have differed in their traditional perspectives on how best to order society. The fundamental Western philosophy prioritizes the inviolability of individual freedom and rights; essential Eastern values favor societal stability and security above all. Over time, there has evolved a degree of rapprochement: Westerners acknowledge Easterners' philosophy that freedom and human rights can't exist in a chaotic and turbulent world; Easterners see freedom and human rights as inherent in human nature.
A popular quote by Harvard University professor of government James Q. Wilson reads, "Without Liberty, Law loses its nature and its name, and becomes oppression. Without Law, Liberty also loses its nature and its name, and becomes licentiousness."
Tibet's spiritual leader, the 14th Dalai Lama, said, "We must, therefore, insist on a global consensus, not only on the need to respect human rights worldwide, but also on the definition of these rights . . . for it is the inherent nature of all human beings to yearn for freedom, equality and dignity, and they have an equal right to achieve that."
These contemporary remarks reflect the ancient Buddha's teaching of the Middle Path.

Cambodians in conflict

The basic East-West philosophical difference is mirrored in the conflicts between the stability-security proponents who largely support the Hun Sen regime and the freedom-human rights advocates who generally oppose the regime.
By their culture, Cambodians are generally passive, conforming, and accommodating. Those who are proactive swim against the social norm. Thveu doch ke doch aeng, the Khmers say, meaning, do like others do, a conformist ethos that discourages those who step outside the lines.
In the centuries-old Khmer subservient culture of korup (respect) and kaowd klach (admire and fear), one who is, in the literal sense, extraordinary may be seen as rebellious or even treacherous. In contrast, Socrates, whose philosophy serves as the basis of Western civilization, taught that the truth is determined only through a process of questioning the status quo ante.

Bottom line

The contrast between the Cambodia that deteriorated under Pol Pot's regime of killing and destruction, and contemporary Cambodia where new roads and bridges proliferate and tall buildings dot the skyline, is undeniable.
But this development has been achieved at too high a cost. Nearly half of the country's land area has been given away to foreign entities in the form of decades-long land concessions, to be developed by companies that will provide some low-skilled jobs in Cambodia but will take their profits out of the country. This practice has enriched a few but has deprived hundreds of thousands of Cambodians of their homes and land with little or no compensation. This is not a democratic government, but an oppressive one. In the words of World Policy Journal's "Target Cambodia: Games People Play": "Cambodia today is quite literally giving itself away, especially to China and Vietnam – two rivals vying for regional influence." "Over the last 30 years, the Sino-Vietnamese rivalry has shaped Cambodia militarily, politically, and economically, and there are no signs that this will change," writes WJP this summer.
As such, Cambodia is a pawn used by China (which has spent $9 billion in aid and investments in Cambodia) and Vietnam (more than a quarter of a billion by the end of 2010). The Cambodian government "is sacrificing the rights of its own people and the future of the country in favor of competing regional powers" as it courts foreign investment, says WPJ.
Foreign Policy magazine's 2012 Index lists Cambodia 37th on a list of the world's 60 most fragile states – a ranking higher than the year before. The increased fragility assessed by international observers anticipates growing discontent with the Hun Sen regime, which eventually will run out of land to grab, will be unable to balance a budget reliant on donor aid, will fail at balancing the competing interests of its benefactors. A regime that rules by the application of direct power will eventually lose its leverage and will topple or be toppled.
Dictatorial and tyrannical

The current Hun Sen regime is dictatorial and tyrannical.
A person, or a group of persons, who comes to power, even through election, but accumulates and exercises all executive, legislative, and judicial powers to the exclusion of others, is a dictator. When the person acts at the same time as policeman, lawmaker, and judge, that person dictates and tyrannizes through abuses of power.

Hun Sen is such a person; his ruling Cambodian People's Party is such a group. Both have assigned all three powers to themselves: They take land from the marginalized, kick them from their homes, arrest those resistant, pronounce judgment through arbitrary laws they make. An opposition and an election are ornaments to justify their rule and satisfy the appetite of those thirsty for evidence of an electoral process and human rights. In reality, all branches of government are their tools. The branches do not act to check and balance each other; therefore, abuses of power are endemic. The police and the military, too, are but tools of the regime.
Hun Sen rode to power under the guns of the Vietnamese invading forces that knocked out Pol Pot from power in 1979 and installed Hun Sen as premier in 1985. He lost the UN-organized general election in 1993 but bullied his way with threats of war to become number two in the government. In 1997 he launched a military coup against the number one and summarily executed more than 100 officials and officers of his royalist coalition.

The fight

In an atmosphere in which freedom is lacking and political retaliation is rampant, the results of an April Gallup poll, which found that 90 percent of Cambodians approve of the job Hun Sen is doing, are highly suspect. Anecdotal evidence suggests rather that Cambodians' dissatisfaction with Hun Sen and the CPP is increasing. Similarly, the regime's success in recent local elections demonstrates villagers' tendency to vote the way the local commune leader directs. A truly free and fair franchise is quite absent in Cambodia today.
Consistent with the politically repressed atmosphere in the country and with the prevalence of a traditional culture of subservience, the most vocal opposition to the government led by Hun Sen comes from abroad. The Khmer People Power Movement and the Lotus Revolution are two organizations based abroad that have called for election boycotts and for open rebellion a la Arab Spring. Self-exiled opposition leader Sam Rainsy, too, provides a rallying point for such overt opposition as exists. Can these expatriates foment a successful rebellion at home?

A battle of ideas

Action comes out of thought. Lord Buddha teaches, "An idea that is developed and put into action is more important than an idea that exists only as an idea." President John F. Kennedy reminded, "A man may die, nations may rise and fall, but an idea lives on."
Recently I put forward a thought on a three-pronged recipe for Cambodians' survival: Change old habits, practice Buddha's teaching, initiate nonviolent action – not necessarily in that order. I am a believer in creative thinking and in not being driven on autopilot by raw emotion.
A weekend ago, an article, "Gene Sharp: A dictator's worst nightmare" by Mairi Mackay of CNN, came to my attention. At a meeting on a dark January evening in an anonymous townhouse, Sharp talked about how to stage a revolution: To a young Iranian discouraged by the brutality by the government against protesters, Sharp commented, "You don't march down the street towards soldiers with machine guns." Then came creative thinking: "You could have everybody stay at home." "Total silence of the city," Sharp suggested.
I have written about Gene Sharp, his book "From Dictatorship to Democracy" – a how-to manual for overthrowing dictatorships – and nonviolent action. Mackay's article exposes Sharp's simple ideas of revolution: "No regime, not even the most brutally authoritarian, can survive without the support of its people. So, Sharp proposes, take it away." As a dictatorship depends on the people and the institutions to stay in power, Sharp advocates to "shrink that support." Like termites in a tree, nonviolent action eats away at a regime's pillars of power, "Eventually, the whole thing collapses."

Credible alternative

Regime proponents and opponents spring from the same cultural foundation, and as people have the capacity to observe and to analyze, it is important that democrats present themselves as a credible and reliable alternative to the incumbents. If the alternative seems stable, reasonable, and able to follow through on its commitments, people will be more inclined to risk change. Recall former political prisoner Boun Chan Mol's book Charet Khmer of the general Khmer personal traits. Boun advocated change. And change begins with oneself.
Democrats could begin by building on a familiar foundation. Buddhist teachings are revered by nearly all Cambodians. Do all good; Do no evil; Purify the mind; and move on. A more contemporary take on that Buddhist philosophy comes from Teddy Roosevelt, an activist and U.S. president who advised: "Do what you can, with what you have, where you are."
By encouraging sympathizers to become better men and women by following Buddha's – and Roosevelt's – teaching, democrats can distinguish themselves from the autocrats who are motivated by greed and self-interest. The people will see, hear, and believe in them as they develop "Barmei," or "Parami" in Pali – an influence through an accumulation of the 10 qualities Buddha outlines for humanity. Buddhism is an integral part of the fabric of Khmer society. As people believe in their own capacity for change, the political yoke that is holding them back will be more readily cast off.
A creative mind should start immediately to de-personalize the centuries-old culture of korup (respect), kaowd klach (admire and fear), smoh trang (loyalty/fidelity), bamroeur (serve), kapier (defend), directed toward individual leaders, and to reorient them toward ideals and concepts such as cheat (nation), pracheathipattei (democracy), sereipheap (freedom), sithi (rights). Developing an understanding that power resides within ourselves, not in the person of an arbitrary leader, will help us to move forward.

Lord Buddha taught more than 2,500 years ago, "No one saves us but ourselves. No one can and no one may. We ourselves must walk the path." "Do not depend on others," Buddha preaches. "He is able who thinks he is able."
---------------
The AHRC is not responsible for the views shared in this article, which do not necessarily reflect its own.

About the Author:Dr. Gaffar Peang-Meth is retired from the University of Guam, where he taught political science for 13 years. He currently lives in the United States.

# # #
About AHRC: The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional non-governmental organisation that monitors human rights in Asia, documents violations and advocates for justice and institutional reform to ensure the protection and promotion of these rights. The Hong Kong-based group was founded in 1984.

ឆ្នាំ២០១៥ កម្ពុជាមានអគ្គិសនីប្រើប្រាស់គ្រប់គ្រាន់

 Monday, 02 July 2012 10:59 ដោយៈ អេង គឹមជាង-Posted: ID-010

ភ្នំពេញ៖ មន្រ្តីជាន់ខ្ពស់ នៃក្រសួងឧស្សាកម្ម នថ្លែងថា នៅក្នុងឆ្នាំ២០១៥ខាងមុខនេះ កម្ពុជាមិន ខ្វះថាមពលអគ្គិសនីប្រើប្រាស់នោះទេ ប៉ុន្តែទោះបីជាយ៉ាងណាការ តភ្ជាប់ បណ្តេញអគ្គិសនីមក ពីប្រទេសជិតខាងនៅតែបន្តដដែល។

លោក ទុន លាន អគ្គនាយកថាមពល នៃក្រសួងឧស្សាហកម្ម រ៉ែ និងថាមពល មានប្រសាសន៍ ប្រាប់ក្រុមអ្នកសារព័ត៌មាន នៅក្រៅអង្គប្រជុំថ្នាក់ឧត្តមមន្រ្តីថាមពល អាស៊ាន លើកទី៣០ នា សណ្ឋាគារកាំបូឌីយ៉ាណា នៅថ្ងៃទី២ ខែកក្កដា ឆ្នាំ២០១២ថា ការវិវត្តន៍ដំណើរការ ជាបន្តបន្ទាប់ របស់ថាមពលអគ្គិសនី គឺមានជាហូរហែ ហើយឆ្នាំ២០១៥នោះ កម្ពុជាពិតជាមិនខ្វះ នូវថាមពលអគ្គិសនីប្រើប្រាស់ទៀតឡើយ។

ប៉ុន្តែបញ្ហាការតភ្ជាប់បណ្តាញអគ្គិសនីពីប្រទេសក្បែរខាងនៅតែមាន។ លោក បន្តថា «កម្ពុជាយើង នៅឆ្នាំ២០១៥ មានអគ្គិសនីប្រើប្រាស់គ្រប់គ្រាន់ហើយ រួចប្រទេសដែលជាសមាជិកអាស៊ាន នៅថ្ងៃអនាគត ទោះជាប្រទេសខ្លះមានអគ្គិសនី គ្រប់គ្រាន់ ឬខ្វះ ឬលើសនោះ គឺត្រូវតែទាមទារ ការតភ្ជាប់រវាងគ្នានឹងគ្នាដដែរ»។

លោក ទុន លាន បន្ថែមទៀតថា កាលពីឆ្នាំ២០១១ កន្លងមកនេះ កម្ពុជាចំណេញពីថាម ពលអគ្គិសនី បានជាង៣០លានដុល្លារ។ នៅឆ្នាំ២០១២នេះ ប្រេងសាំងមានការឡើងថ្លៃ ដែលធ្វើឲ្យចំណូលរបស់អគ្គិសនីមិនសមតាមបំណងប្រាថ្នាដូចឆ្នាំកន្លងមក ដោយសារមិន ទាន់បានដំឡើងថ្លៃអគ្គិសនី ហើយតម្លៃអគ្គិសនីនឹងអាចដំឡើង នាពេលដ៏ឆាប់ ខាងមុខនេះ ជាមិនខាន។

អគ្គនាយកថាមពល នៃក្រសួងឧស្សាហកម្មរ៉ែ រូបនេះបន្តថា នៅឆ្នាំ២០១៥ខាងមុខនេះ ដើម្បី បំពេញតម្រូវការប្រើប្រាស់អគ្គិសនីឲ្យបានគ្រប់គ្រាន់នោះ កម្ពុជា ត្រូវការថាមពលអគ្គិសនី ជាង ១០០០ (មួយពាន់)មេហ្កាវ៉ាត់ទៀត។

នៅក្នុងរាជធានីភ្នំពេញការប្រើប្រាស់អគ្គិសនីជាង៣០០មេហ្កាវ៉ាត់ ហើយប្រភពថាមពល អគ្គិសនីបច្ចុប្បន្ននេះ បានមកពីប្រទេសវៀតណាម មួយចំនួន ហើយបានមកពីការ ផលិតវារី អគ្គិសនី និងមួយចំនួនទៀត បានមកពីរោងចក្រផលិតប្រេង។  ការនាំចូល ថាមពល អគ្គិសនី ពីវៀតណាម មានចំនួន ១៣៥មេហ្កាវ៉ាត់, វារីអគ្គិសនីគិរីរម្យ១មាន១២មេហ្កាវ៉ាត់, វារីអគ្គិសនីគិរីរម្យ៣ មាន១៨មេហ្កាវ៉ាត់ ហើយវារីអគ្គិសនីកំចាយ ដែលមានអនុភាព ១៩៣មេហ្កាវ៉ាត់ តែកម្លាំងដើររបស់វាមិនទាន់គ្រប់ដោយសារពុំមានទឹកគ្រប់គ្រាន់។ ការផ្គត់ផ្គង់តម្រូវការក្នុងស្រុកដែលនាំចូលពីប្រទេសថៃ វៀតណាម និងឡាវ សរុបប្រហែលជា៤៥ភាគរយ

International relations: How to foster host-national friendships

Elisabeth Gareis

Friendship with host nationals is a central predictor of the overall sojourn satisfaction of international students.

International students who make friends with host nationals have stronger language skills, better academic performance, lower levels of stress and greater life satisfaction. Friendships also aid overall adjustment and improve attitudes towards the host country.

Well-integrated international students, in turn, are more likely to participate in the classroom, thus enriching domestic students’ educational experience and advancing international perspectives.

The benefits of friendship between international students and hosts extend beyond the students’ sojourn. International students often fill influential leadership positions after returning home and can play an important part in fostering productive relations with the former host country.

Unfortunately, a significant number of international students have difficulty making friends with host nationals.

In a recent study, 38% of 454 participating international students studying in the US had no close American friend and were unsatisfied with this lack of contact.

Broken down into home regions, the percentage of students without host-national friends was highest among students from East Asia (52%) and lowest for students from northern and central Europe (16%) and Anglophone countries (10%).

In addition, the host region affected friendship numbers and satisfaction levels. Students attending college in non-metropolitan areas fared better than students in metropolitan areas, and students in the south of the United States fared better than those in the northeast.

A number of factors influence friendship development across cultures. Cultural similarity plays a role, as does intercultural competence, language proficiency, motivation and the level of identification with one’s native culture.

A potential deterrent – especially in large universities and metropolitan areas – are existing networks of compatriots and other international students. These networks provide a safe environment and readymade support for the students’ transition experience. The side effect can be a reduced need for engaging with host nationals.

Non-receptivity on the part of the hosts can further diminish the students’ drive for pursuing friendships. Negative attitudes can arise, for example, when a large influx of international students is perceived as a disadvantage for local students or a threat to their culture.

Recommendations

This situation is not new. A lack of meaningful contact with host nationals has been one of the uppermost complaints of international students for some time and in a variety of countries.

What has changed is the level of competition to attract international students. Students increasingly consult student satisfaction surveys in order to choose environments that are academically as well as socially optimal.

What can institutions do to promote contact between international and domestic students?

A number of measures suggest themselves, including short-term events to support contact initiation, long-term endeavours to provide opportunities for relationship development, and training measures for international and domestic students as well as faculty.

Examples of short-term events are orientation programmes with ice-breakers for domestic and international students, and bonding activities (such as camps, hikes and bike tours) for new students at the beginning of the academic year. Institutions should also offer frequent extracurricular social activities throughout the year (for example, field trips, film festivals, ethnic dinners, sporting events, parties).

Long-term measures include mixed residential facilities, pairing international and domestic students in peer mentoring programmes, weekly mingling opportunities (for example, international coffee hour, conversation clubs), and the creation of internationally focused student organisations (for example, intramural soccer, model United Nations, culture club).

Domestic participation in some of these activities could be encouraged by providing incentives (for example, making active engagement part of scholarship or honours programmes). Likewise, leaders from organisations for students from the more culturally distant countries (for example, Chinese student organisations) could be involved in the planning of intercultural events so that their social influence encourages their peers to participate.

Training for international and domestic students as well as faculty and staff can be provided in the form of classes and workshops on intercultural and oral communication (especially as it relates to friendship initiation and development). Projects could include video productions, social media and blogs on a variety of themes.

In addition, pedagogy workshops for faculty could focus on how to integrate international students in the classroom (for example, how to reach students with diverse learning styles, encourage participation in a culturally sensitive manner, and design effective mixed-group or buddy projects).

These measures have been tried in various institutions with positive effect. It should be noted, however, that many are unresearched. Further studies should determine what is successful in specific contexts.

Some universities have hired cross-cultural consulting firms to provide advice and launch public relations campaigns for showcasing their initiatives.

Even in the most favourable environments, accountability also lies with the students themselves. Students interested in host-national contact need intercultural and language proficiency. Although population density may pose distractions, students can make a conscious effort to avoid self-segregation even in metropolitan environments.

Likewise, domestic students should reach out more. It may help if institutions involve domestic returnees from study-abroad programmes in their efforts to internationalise.

Colleges worldwide are the prime location for intercultural encounters. Considering the far-reaching positive effects of friendship between international and domestic students, it is crucial that institutions provide the infrastructure that enables students to meet and to build relationships. Students should take advantage of the opportunity to establish a global network of friends.

* Dr Elisabeth Gareis is an associate professor of communication studies at Baruch College-City University of New York.

Power and responsibility – The growing influence of global rankings

Richard Holmes

A few years ago I remember a dean at a Malaysian university urging faculty to look out for potential external examiners. There was one condition. They had to be at universities in “the Times” top 200. The dean, of course, was referring to the then Times Higher Education Supplement-Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings.

Time has passed and the THE-QS rankings have now become two rather different league tables. More global rankings have appeared and a succession of spin-offs, regional, reputational, subject and young university rankings, have appeared.

Rankings have become very big business and they are acquiring a prominent role in the policies of university administrators and national governments.

Times Higher Education used to be proud of the attention its rankings received. The THE ranking archives from 2004-09 contain this introduction:

“The publication of the world rankings has become one of the key annual events in the international higher education calendar. Since their first appearance in 2004, the global university league tables have been recognised as the most authoritative source of broad comparative performance information on universities across the world.

“They are now regularly used by undergraduate and postgraduate students to help select degree courses, by academics to inform career decisions, by research teams to identify new collaborative partners and by university managers to benchmark their performance and set strategic priorities.

“As nations across the globe focus on the establishment of world-class universities as essential elements of economic policy, the rankings are increasingly employed as a tool for governments to set national policy.”

Arbiters of excellence

Rankings have indeed become arbiters of excellence. They are cited endlessly in advertisements, prospectuses and promotional literature.

They influence government strategy in some countries and getting into the top 50, 100 or 200 is often a target of national policy, sometimes attracting as much attention as grabbing medals at the Olympics or getting into the World Cup quarter-finals.

There have even been proposals to use rankings as an instrument of immigration policy, presumably to ensure that only smart people are added to the workforce.

In 2010, politicians in Denmark suggested using graduation from one of the top 20 universities as a criterion for immigration to the country. The Netherlands has gone even further. Take at a look at this page from the Dutch government’s London embassy website:

To be considered a ‘highly skilled migrant’ you need:

“A masters degree or doctorate from a recognised Dutch institution of higher education listed in the Central Register of Higher Education Study Programmes (CROHO) or a masters degree or doctorate from a non-Dutch institution of higher education which is ranked in the top 150 establishments in either the Times Higher Education 2007 list or the Academic Ranking of World Universities 2007 issued by Jiao Ton Shanghai University [sic] in 2007.

“The certificate or diploma must also be approved by the Netherlands Organisation for International Cooperation in Higher Education (NUFFIC). To obtain this approval, you need to send your document(s) to: NUFFIC, Postbus 29777, 2502 LT Den Haag, The Netherlands.”

In another document those who meet the above criteria are described as “highly educated persons”.

Admission to The Netherlands under this scheme is not automatic. There are additional points for speaking English or Dutch, being between 21 and 40 or graduating from a university that has signed up for the Bologna declaration.

So no job and a poor masters in humanities from the university in 149th place in the 2007 THES-QS world university rankings (City University of Hong Kong)?

I suspect you would have problems getting a job in Hong Kong – but you could still be eligible to be a highly skilled migrant to The Netherlands, provided you spoke English and were in your twenties or thirties.

City University of Hong Kong graduates are fortunate. If the Dutch government had picked the 2006 rankings as the benchmark, the university would not have been on the list.

And too bad for those with outstanding doctorates in physics, engineering or philosophy from Tel Aviv university. In 2007 their university would not have been on the list, having fallen from 147th place in 2006 to 151st in 2007.

Also, perhaps someone should tell The Netherlands government about what one has to do to turn a bachelor of arts degree into a master of arts from Oxford or Cambridge.

Recently, Russia indicated that it will make a placing in the major rankings a condition for recognition of foreign degrees, and India has stated that local universities can only enter into agreements with those universities in the Shanghai rankings or THE rankings – to be precise only those in the top 500 of those rankings.

There is something odd about this. THE prints the top 200 universities and has another 200 on an iPhone app. So where are the other 100 coming from? Or was it just a journalistic misunderstanding?

Choice of rankings is disturbing

To some extent, all this appears to be another example of the pointless bureaucratisation of modern universities, where the ability to write proposals or list learning outcomes is more highly valued than actual research or teaching.

Most academics, left to their own devices, could surely judge the suitability of potential collaborators, external examiners or contributors to journals just as well as the THE or Shanghai or QS rankers.

As for using rankings to select immigrants, if the idea is to pick smart people, then the Wonderlic test would probably be just as good. After all, it worked very well for the US National Football League.

More disturbing perhaps is the choice of rankings. Few people would argue with using the Shanghai ARWU rankings to evaluate universities. Their reliability and methodological stability make them an obvious choice.

But the THE rankings are only two years old and underwent drastic methodological changes between the first two editions. Is India proposing to consider the 2010 or the 2011 rankings? If there are more changes in methods in years to come, what will happen to an agreement negotiated with a university that is the top 500 one year but not next?

Phil Baty, head of the THE ranking, has just published an article in University World News accepting that rankings are inherently crude and that they should be used with care. This is most welcome and it is certainly an improvement on those previous pronouncements.

Let us hope that the THE rankings do become more transparent, starting with breaking up the clusters of indicators and reducing dependence on Thomson Reuters and its normalised citation indicator.

Another dangerous thing about the Indian government proposals is that Thomson Reuters and ISI are the source for two of the Shanghai indicators, publications and highly cited researchers, and they collect and analyse data for THE.

The idea of a single organisation shaping higher education practices and government policy around the world, even deciding who can live in prosperous countries, is not an attractive one.

How to respond

So what can be done?

The International Rankings Expert Group has been getting ready to audit rankings, but so far there seems to be no sign of anyone actually being audited. Regulation does not seem to be the answer then.

Perhaps what we need is healthy competition between ranking, and constant criticism.

It would help perhaps if governments, universities and the media paid some attention to other rankings such as Scimago, HEEACT from Taiwan, and URAP from the Middle East Technical University, not just to the big two or the big three.

These could be used to assess the output and quality of research since they appear to be at least as good as the Shanghai Rankings, although they are not as broadly based as other world rankings.

But above all, Phil Baty’s admission that there are aspects of academic life where rankings are of little value is very helpful. For, things like collaboration and recognition, common sense and disciplinary knowledge and values should be just as valid, maybe more so.

* Richard Holmes is a lecturer at Universiti Teknologi MARA in Malaysia and author of the University Rankings Watch blog.
 

Uphill battle to reform high-stakes university entrance exams in Asia

Yojana Sharma

For millions of young people in China it has been a make-or-break month. Results of the national college entrance exam, the gaokao, are now being released and the scramble for the best university places has begun – and in many cases, for any place at all.

But while the annual hysteria over the gaokao, which took place over three days in early June, is beginning to wind down, the debate over reforms of the high-stakes exam continues.

Several countries in Asia have a similar admissions system that depends on a national selection exam.

University entrance examinations in Japan and Taiwan take place over two days, while South Korea allows only one day for six subjects, a system thought to increase the pressure on students. Vietnam’s university entrance exam takes place countrywide on 7 July.

Countries like South Korea have in recent years introduced reforms to the highly stressful college entrance system.

Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training said earlier this year it plans to change the one-size-fits-all exams from 2020, hoping to align them more closely to intended subject majors. With university entrance based on total marks, Vietnam has seen a severe mismatch between students and potential careers.

Some changes have already been introduced in Vietnam in time for this year’s exam. For example, students who have obtained first, second and third prizes in national exams can be recruited directly by universities without sitting the entrance exams.

And medical and pharmacology universities are now allowed to admit ethnic minority students and those with official residency permits for 62 disadvantaged districts without the entrance exam, which the health ministry’s science and training department described as an “important development” in this year’s admissions process.

Reforms to the gaokao

But the 600,000 students taking the Vietnamese exam pale beside China’s 9.15 million school students who sat the gaokao last month. Around three-quarters will qualify for a university place.

There has been criticism that those who score well and go to top universities are doing so partly because they are the best rote learners rather than the innovative thinkers the country needs.

From 2000 onwards, China’s authorities tried to counter some of the criticisms, introducing an essay to gauge creativity and imagination, and more problem-solving and logical thinking.

But centralised university entrance examinations in Asia have also been criticised for determining young people’s future through one test.

The Chinese government has said it will make further changes to the system.

In a recent 10-year education reform and development plan, education ministry officials acknowledged the unfairness of “a single examination that defines a student's destiny”. And in November the ministry promised “multiple measures” to spot talented young people.

The ministry wants to encourage top universities to use an independent exam to test students hoping to enter universities in 2012. “Encouraging universities to select students based on independent criteria is an important supplement to the country's system of college entrance exams,” said a ministry notice in November.

“It's unhelpful to talk of the complete abolition of the gaokao system, but there needs to be a re-evaluation of its importance,” said Xiong Bingqi, vice-president of the 21st Century Education Research Centre in Beijing.

Xiong suggested: “The responsibility for admissions [should be] shifted to universities themselves and [there should be a] focus on building up their independent recruitment abilities. The idea that students can only choose one university instead of receiving offers from different universities is not right.”

Korea’s reforms

China is not alone in questioning the value of its higher education entrance tests.

In 2008 South Korea bit the bullet and revamped its entrance system, based at that time entirely on the College Scholastic Ability Test or Su Neung.

Under the reform, universities got admissions officers to evaluate applications based on potential. Criteria include recommendations from schools and consideration of extra-curricular activities in addition to test scores.

The South Korean government was particularly concerned about the hours of after-school cramming over many years and the quality of private cram schools that prepared students for the eight-hour test marathon, normally held in November.

The new admissions system was adopted by just 10 Korean universities in 2008. Now 120 universities use it, with the help of increased government subsidies for introducing the system. The latest government statistics show that just over one in 10 students are now selected outside the national test system.

According to universities, selecting students who are more interested in, and display more specific aptitude for, the field they are applying in, rather than relying on the highest overall test scores, has meant students perform better during subsequent years at university compared to those with high scores. There have also been reduced drop-out rates in particular subjects.

But the university-administered admissions system comes with a price tag. The government subsidy for university-led admissions was 15.7 billion won (US$13.6 million) in 2008, and more than double that last year. It is expected to reach almost 40 billion won this year.

A challenge for China

The cost for China, with a much larger university system, would be huge, although no official estimates have been released publicly.

“These kind of services in China will require tremendous amounts of funding,” said Heidi Ross, professor of education policy studies and director of the East Asian Study Centre at Indiana University in the United States.

“It will require development and resources at all the institutions in China. Institutions will have to have admissions officers, data and research. Admissions officers are expensive and it carries financial risks when admissions officers don’t get the classifications right.”

And, says Yimin Wang, a doctoral student at Indiana University who has studied reform of the gaokao, there are huge differences between mostly urban South Korea and China, which would need to ensure fair admissions from rural areas.

Former high-school teacher Li Guangxue, writing in Shanghai Education News, argued that given China's large population, the gaokao is the most just and efficient way of assessing students in the country.

It would be almost impossible for Chinese admission officers to read the personal statements, recommendation letters and additional information of 10 million applicants within a limited amount of time, Li said.

And the government’s idea of special admissions offers for students with exceptional talents in certain fields that permit lower gaokao scores would pose a problem, Li argued. “Most of these opportunities are given to well-known high schools in the city. The poor rural population, which is the most desperate, does not receive such benefits.”

Corruption might be another problem if universities were to be given more autonomy to select students. “Since no standard test or requirement is in place for testing a student, there might be more room for students to bribe admissions officers,” Li added.

Many critics say the time and money required to travel to university interviews would also discriminate against poorer students.

The ministry has begun to allow some universities the right of ‘autonomous recruitment’ using exams designed by the university itself, sometimes supplemented by an academic interview with an admissions committee. But with so few universities granted this autonomy, it hardly amounts to a change in the system.

The few exceptions are touted in official media – Peking university used the system introduced in 2009 of using a high-school head’s recommendation as a basis for an onsite interview, while accepting a lower gaokao score. But it used this system to admit just 3% of its students.

“Shanghai has held spring university entrance exams in addition to the gaokao for years, but few students opt for this method,” Li pointed out.

Group admissions

The South University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, in the news for having more autonomy than other public universities, has selected students using its own tests – but these are in addition to the gaokao, which will still account for 60% of overall marks, while the university’s test and school performance will account for 40%.

“It is not a huge reform in the way the students are evaluated,” noted Heidi Ross. “Allocating 40% [outside the gaokao] is a long way off from 100%.”

An additional concern is that students will have to take more than one highly stressful exam, or even that learning for university tests interferes with gaokao preparation.

Top universities have formed admissions alliances, where one exam can be taken to try for admission to any one of a group of universities.

Tsinghua University, University of Science and Technology of China, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Xi'an Jiaotong University and Nanjing University formed China's first alliance, named the Hua League, in 2010.

A similar alliance was formed later the same year and includes the universities of Peking, Beijing Beihang, Beijing Normal, Nankai, Fudan, Xiamen and Hong Kong.

Reforms in future

“China needs to manage to have an equitable system and a quality system. There won’t be one without the other,” said Ross. “It is usually elite institutions that set the stage for reform, but the vast majority of students are not going to those institutions."

She believes that with demographic decline in China “the tier three and four universities are the ones that need to find their niche and seek out students. That’s where the impetus for reform will come from.”

But real root-and-branch reform of the system is still a long way off.

“No one knows how to get rid the exam because it is a last bastion of meritocracy,” she told University World News. “The gaokao has tremendous staying power.”

Professor convicted of ‘spying’ will not appeal five-month sentence

University entrance exam system costly and needs reform in Vietnam

End of sanctions may improve prospects for unemployed graduates

International help to upgrade Burma's neglected university sector

Workers in Thailand dubious of firm’s offer

UN and Cambodia's legal eagles hold forum

International Business Chamber moves to Phnom Penh Tower

Members of the International Business Chamber of Cambodia pose for a group photograph at the company’s office in Phnom Penh yesterday. Photograph: Pha Lina/Phnom Penh Post

A lesson for Iraq in Cambodia

By Muhammad Cohen

PHNOM PENH - Cambodia's Khmer Rouge mass murder sites affect visitors in different ways. For me, it meant weeping throughout and being unable to reconcile the contrast between massive, deadly brutality on display and the seemingly gentle, friendly Cambodia of today.

Cambodia does itself and the world a great service by preserving the memories of the millions that died during the 1975-79 Khmer Rouge reign of terror under the leadership of Pol Pot. Both Tuol Sleng, the prison known as S-21, and Cheoung Ek, the so-called Killing Fields, remain powerfully evocative even after the passage of decades. But their most important modern day lesson may be waiting to be learned 6,500 kilometers (3,900 miles) away in Iraq.

Some displays at the two sites are positively chilling. At CheoungEk, 15 kilometers south of capital city Phnom Penh, a Buddhist stupa towers over the site's 129 mass graves. The bottom level of the stupa holds clothing from the estimated 20,000 people executed and buried there.

The next eight levels hold skulls from victims arranged by estimated age, many showing signs of fatal blows with shovels or ax handles - favored by the Khmer Rouge as an execution method because it saved bullets. The top eight levels contain bones sorted by type. Paths throughout the two hectare site, once a peaceful mangosteen orchard, still reveal bone fragments and teeth peeking through the soil.

The Khmer Rouge converted Tuol Sleng Primary School and Tuol Svay Prey High School in central Phnom Penh into Security Office 21. The S-21 museum preserves classrooms turned into cells, pieces of the chalkboard still intact; the wire woven into nets across the exterior hallways to prevent inmates from attempting suicide leaps; and metal beds rigged with shackles and car batteries for interrogations.

But the most haunting feature of S-21 are the inmate photographs, row upon row of black-and-white head and shoulder identification shots. Beyond the vacant eyes of the subjects, the portraits are a monument to the banality of evil. The people who took these photographs, developed them, catalogued them, and filed them were simply bureaucrats doing their jobs.

What's too often lost in the use of "banality of evil" is that the banality in no way excuses or explains the evil, which took place on an unprecedented scale in Cambodia. Some two million Cambodians out of an estimated population of 7.3 million perished under the Khmer Rouge regime. By proportion of the national population, that's way more than Stalin, Hitler or Mao murdered, making Pol Pot the all-time leader in mass murder.

Of course, no one kills that many people alone, and that's another incredible thing about visiting those tragic sites in today's Cambodia. Everyone you meet around town seems so pleasant and cheerful, it's hard to fathom how these same people or their parents could have been party to such atrocities.

Examples such as the Soviet gulags, Indonesia's 1965 anti-communist purges, and the 1994 massacres in Rwanda, underline that no nationality, ethnic or racial group has a monopoly on massive scale inhumanity.

Setting the stage
What's also fascinating is that the Khmer Rouge didn't commit murder in the name of religion or ethnicity or nationalism. It was just politics. That's another indication that genocide can happen anywhere when the political conditions are right, as they were in mid-1970s Cambodia.

For centuries, the country was caught between more powerful neighbors, Vietnam to the east and Thailand to the west. Then in the 1960s, Cambodia got caught in the middle of the American war in Vietnam. American planes bombed North Vietnamese bases inside Cambodia, also inflicting massive collateral damage on civilians.

Following General Lon Nol's 1970 rightwing coup that ousted king Norodom Sihanouk, US and South Vietnamese troops crossed the border, pushing North Vietnamese forces further into the interior. More civilian casualties resulted and Cambodia's politics became more deeply dividing.

The US withdrawal from Vietnam in 1973 weakened Lon Nol's government and strengthened the Khmer Rouge. In April 1975, with Phnom Penh surrounded and American aid ended, the government surrendered to the Khmer Rouge.

Academics still debate to what extent the US extension of the Vietnam conflict into Cambodia helped or harmed the Khmer Rouge's cause. The same can be said about the Vietnamese troops. What's clear is that foreigners fighting on Cambodian territory brutalized the population and helped unravel the country's social fabric, paving the way for extremism and tragedy.

A political void following the ouster of a long-serving leader, foreign troops fighting their own war as an away game, and, a neighbor anxious to take advantage of the turmoil - standing amid the mass graves, it seems apparent that Cambodia's past could easily represent Iraq's future.

The American invasion destroyed the political fabric of Iraq (some would argue of America, too). The invaders destroyed Iraq's government, the ruling party, and the army. The country plunged into greater chaos and factional fighting than Cambodia ever suffered before the Khmer Rouge triumph.

Iraq's traditional unfriendly neighbor Iran used the opportunity to fill the power vacuum. According to some, Iran sent in its own operatives. As a bonus, Iran can play the religion card with Iraq's Shi'ite Muslim majority that had been suppressed under Saddam Hussein, who favored the Sunni minority.

The presence of foreign troops fueled an insurgency that forced Iraqis to choose between sides in a fight they didn't want. The violence led to further polarization. It also stunted political growth. Reminiscent of post-coup Cambodia, the government is massively corrupt and largely distrusted.

The withdrawal of American forces hasn't solved Iraq's political problems, just as America's withdrawal from Vietnam didn't lead to Cambodian reconciliation. It was two years after the Americans left Vietnam that the Khmer Rouge came to power and commenced their killing spree.

August marks two years since American combat troops left Iraq. Stay tuned - and hope that in this world vastly more connected than in 1975, genocide can't happen again.

Former broadcast news producer Muhammad Cohen told America’s story to the world as a US diplomat and is author of Hong Kong On Air, a novel set during the 1997 handover about television news, love, betrayal, financial crisis, and cheap lingerie. See his blog, online archive and more at MuhammadCohen.com.

Cambodia gives green light to British life insurer Prudential


PHNOM PENH, June 29 (Xinhua) -- Britain's leading life insurer, Prudential Plc, is going to open its office in Phnom Penh, said the British ambassador to Cambodia Mark Gooding on Friday.
Speaking in a meeting with Cambodian deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Keat Chhon, Mark Gooding thanked the ministry for giving an approval in principle on June 28, 2012 to the U.K.-based Prudential Plc to open a life insurance company in Cambodia.
Keat Chhon said that British investment here reflected British investors' trust on Cambodian economic and political situation, adding that Cambodia's insurance development is in early stage and has much room to grow.

Currently, Cambodia has two life insurers. The first one is Cambodian Life Insurance Company (Cambodian Life), which went into services in May, and the other is the Canada-based insurer, Manulife, which was officially launched on Thursday.
Cambodian Life is a joint venture by Cambodia's finance ministry and four other partners, namely PT Asuransi from Indonesia, Asia Insurance from Hong Kong, Bangkok Life Assurance and Bangkok Insurance Public from Thailand.

According to Cambodia's insurance law, an insurance company is required to have the minimum capital of 7 million U.S. dollars.

Opinion: Confucius Institute Enhances Chinese Language Education, Cultural Exchange in NW Cambodia

  Please read from the Phnom Penh Post Please read from the Cambodianess  Confucius institutes have been playing a vital role in promoting C...