Harvard University
students under investigation for cheating on a take-home government
course exam said they’re waging a battle against the allegations.
About
20 students and graduates have gone to the media to tell their side of
the story, saying skipping classes, sharing notes and collaborating on
tests were all tacitly condoned by the professor and teaching fellows of
the course being probed, students who took the class said.
The
probe involves about 125 students over cheating on a take-home exam for
the course, called Introduction to Congress. Harvard officials called it
the biggest such probe in living memory. The students who are talking
said they want to remain anonymous because of concern the accusations
could affect their degrees or jobs taken since graduating. One 2012
graduate said losing his bachelor’s degree in economics might cost him
his position at a Wall Street finance firm.
“Harvard went public
with their version of the story, the version that looks good for the
school,” a Harvard senior said. “We’re trying to present the other
side.”
A Harvard e-mail to the 2012 graduate previewed his
hearing before the Administrative Board, a college disciplinary body,
for cheating on the final exam. The process of responding to a complaint
to the board takes about two weeks, according to the letter.
‘Very Unfair’
“There
was a tone set by the nature of the class and the professor teaching
the course that collaboration was OK,” the graduate said in a telephone
interview. “Dragging us into this investigation now, when we have
financial obligations and jobs, seems very unfair.”
Harvard said
last week that each of the students and graduates under investigation
will be called before the Administrative Board. Students found to have
cheated on exams can be asked to withdraw for two semesters, or may
receive a warning or be put on probation, Jay Harris, Harvard’s dean of
undergraduate education, said in an interview last week. Some students
may be exonerated, Harris said. He wouldn’t say whether the board would
consider taking away graduates’ degrees.
No cases have been heard
yet, Harris said. Officials declined to say which course the students
were in because the board’s proceedings are confidential. Students and
graduates are also prohibited from discussing their cases in public, he
said.
Students said the course in question was “Introduction to
Congress,” which had 279 enrolled in the semester ending in May.
Freshmen through seniors were all represented in the class taught by
Matthew Platt, an assistant professor. He declined to comment when
reached by telephone last week and didn’t respond to a call yesterday.
Suspicious Similarities
Harvard
is investigating whether the students inappropriately collaborated on
the take-home exam, Harris said. A teaching fellow in the course noticed
in May that many of the turned-in exams contained suspicious
similarities, and an analysis of all the course’s exams led to the
Administrative Board actions, he said.
“Academic integrity is
very important at Harvard, as are fairness and due process,” Jeff Neal, a
spokesman for Harvard said in an e-mail. “We expect to learn more about
the way the course was organized and how work was approached in class
and on the take-home final,” and the process will “take time and require
patience,” he said.
Platt is known as a good lecturer who kept
the course entertaining, said a senior who took the course and wanted to
remain anonymous. The course is widely considered to be easy, the
senior said.
‘120 A’s’
“Platt said, ‘I gave out 120 A’s
last year and I’ll give out 120 A’s this year,”’ the senior said. “I’m
taking a lot of difficult courses, so I take my A’s where I can get
them.”
Platt said in class that he didn’t mind whether lectures
were skipped, the students said. Students frequently shared lecture
notes, which probably contributed to the similarities in people’s
answers, those who took the course said.
“That’s how people understood this course worked,” the senior said.
Platt’s
exam instructions say that “students may not discuss the exam with
others -- this includes resident tutors, writing centers, etc.” That
contradicts the way the course was actually conducted, students said.
Students
consult Harvard’s Q guide to get previous course- takers’ reviews. Q
guide reviews say that collaboration was accepted in Platt’s course,
students said.