Friday 14 December 2012

CAMBODIA: LRWC and ALRC denounce attacks against HRDs and problems with judicial independence — Asian Human Rights Commission

CAMBODIA: LRWC and ALRC denounce attacks against HRDs and problems with judicial independence — Asian Human Rights Commission

date: September 25, 2012
document id: ALRC-COS-21-08-2012
HRC section: Item 10, Cambodia
speaker: Vani Selvarajah


A Joint Oral Statement to the 21st Session of the UN Human Rights Council from Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada (LRWC), a non-governmental organization in special consultative status, and Asian Legal Resource Centre, (ALRC), a nongovernmental organization in general consultative status


Madame President:

Lawyers Rights Watch Canada and Asian Legal Resource Centre welcomes the report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia1. We share his view that freedom of expression is a principal concern. Cambodian human rights defenders and journalists regularly experience judicial harassment and violence for upholding human rights, particularly in land rights cases. The trend is alarming and escalating. After the incidents noted in reports of the Special Rapporteur and the Secretary General2, dubious charges were filed against three human rights defenders in August and September 20123.

On 11 September 2012, a journalist covering environmental issues was murdered after exposing illegal logging4. Cambodian authorities and judiciary cannot be counted on for impartial investigations or trials.
We applaud the Special Rapporteur's promotion of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights,5 as business enterprises and authorities are frequently involved in human rights violations,6 This and other human rights education is crucial to ensure that public officials are aware of their obligation to encourage civil society human rights training efforts, rather than disrupting them as occurred on 26 July 2012, when armed officials interrupted land rights training of two human rights organizations.
The Special Rapporteur notes continued problems with independence of the judiciary and impunity. He is further concerned about the Government's lack of stated commitment to a time frame and action plan to implement his recommendations for the judiciary. Years of such foot-dragging has contributed to the lack of independence and corruption of judges, prosecutors, court officials and lawyers, whose integrity is crucial to ending the climate of impunity in Cambodia.
We note the OHCHR work with the Cambodian Bar to ensure international human rights perspectives in reviews of the Law on the Bar and Code of Professional Conduct. LRWC would be interested in learning more about future plans to encourage the independence and integrity of Cambodia’s legal profession.

Thank you, Madame President
----------
Notes:
1 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia, Surya P. Subedi, Human Rights Council, A/HRC/21/63, 16 July 2012, www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session21/A-HRC-21-63_en.pdf
2 The role and achievements of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in assisting the Government and people of Cambodia in the promotion and protection of human rights: Report of the Secretary-GeneralA/HRC/21/35, 20 August, 2012, www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session21/A.HRC.21.35_en.pdf
3 In August 2012, ADHOC human rights worker, Mr. Chan Soveth, was charged with "providing assistance to the perpetrator" of a "crime" under Article 544 of the Cambodian Penal Code. On 4 September 2012, land rights activist, Ms.Yorm Bopha, was arrested and charged with "intentional violence with aggravating circumstances" under Article 218 of the Cambodian Penal Code. Ms. Bopha states she was not present at the scene of the alleged violence. On 5 September, 2012, land rights activist, Ms. Tim Sakmony, was arrested and charged with making a "false declaration to a public body for the purpose of obtaining an allowance, a payment or any unlawful advantage" under Article 633 of the Cambodian Penal Code after the owner of developer, Phanimex Company, complained she made a "false declaration" in a request that Phanimex compensate her disabled son after failingto provide him with an apartment after his January 2012 eviction from Borei Keila.
4 The body of Mr. Hang Serei Oudom, a reporter for the Vorakchun Khmer Daily was found on 11 September in his car at a cashew nut plantation in Ratanakiri province. The Director-General of UNESCO has called for an investigation. See http://www.unesco.org/new/en/media-services/singleview/news/director_general_condemns_killing_of_cambodian_journalist_hang_serei_oudom/back/18256/ 5 Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations "Protect, Respect and Remedy" Framework, http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf
6 Abuses in 2012 are outlined in a joint statement by LRWC and Asian Legal Resource Centre made at the 20th Session of the Human Rights Council, , 21 June 2012, http://www.lrwc.org/?p=3940

CAMBODIA: The country must not repeat Burma's mistake — Asian Human Rights Commission

CAMBODIA: The country must not repeat Burma's mistake — Asian Human Rights Commission

CAMBODIA: The country must not repeat Burma's mistake

Contributors: Ou Ritthy
Many opposition politicians, NGO personnel, students, researchers, taxi drivers, vendors and city dwellers expected US president Barack Obama, who attended the 21st ASEAN Summit in Phnom Penh, to push the Cambodian government to better respect human rights and democratic principles, especially free and fair elections in the Kingdom. They hoped for a US pressure to release political prisoners, notably Beehive Radio owner Mam Sonando, land-dispute protestors, and to allow opposition leader Sam Rainsy in self-exiled in Paris, to return to Cambodia to participate in the 2013 election.
Many opposition politicians, NGO personnel, students, researchers, taxi drivers, vendors and city dwellers expected US president Barack Obama, who attended the 21st ASEAN Summit in Phnom Penh, to push the Cambodian government to better respect human rights and democratic principles, especially free and fair elections in the Kingdom. They hoped for a US pressure to release political prisoners, notably Beehive Radio owner Mam Sonando, land-dispute protestors, and to allow opposition leader Sam Rainsy in self-exiled in Paris, to return to Cambodia to participate in the 2013 election.

Sadly, even before President Obama's visit, indications were clear that Phnom Penh had no genuine intention to stop its rights violations, embrace the rule of law, or combat rampant corruption.

Cambodia's minister of information and government spokesman declared publicly that Obama is not Premier Hun Sen's boss or Cambodian government's guru. Such unwelcome and fighting words stand opposite of the Cambodian people's culture of warmth and generosity toward all.

In Burma, thousands of Burmese wearing T-shirts with Obama's portraits lined up the streets, and democracy icon Aug Sann Suu Kyi and reform-minded dictator president Thein Sein, welcomed the US president. Hundreds of students listened to Obama's speech at Rangoon University. In Cambodia, eight citizens were arrested for displaying Obama's portrait and an SOS message on the roofs of their homes. The citizens were facing eviction from their homes at Thmar Kaul village. Worse, people weren't allowed to line up along the Russian Boulevard to welcome Obama. The government said this was due to security reason and traffic congestion. 

Though the US President made no public announcement, in a face-to-face meeting with Premier Hun Sen, President Obama raised several issues as suggested by US republican senators and other national and international rights groups. Impressively, Obama raised concerns over political prisoners and did mention Beehive Radio owner Mam Sonando. But Premier Hun Sen replied there is no political prisoner in Cambodia, only politicians with criminal offences.

U.S. deputy national security advisor Ben Rhodes described the private Obama-Hun Sen meeting as "tense." The Daily Mail reported Cambodia's First Lady Bun Rany Hun Sen was disrespectful of President Obama when she used the Khmer sampeah at chest level reserved for greeting a low level person.

Many Cambodians looked at the White House's photo album of 41 photos of President Obama's visit to ASEAN countries: No photo of Premier Hun Sen whose name was misspelled.

While Obama was in Phnom Penh, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao pledged a $300-$500 yearly loan to Cambodia. Premier Hun Sen was hugely complementing China's support and generosity. Why should there be a surprise when the 21st ASEAN Summit failed to produce a joint resolution, except in economics and trade? Unhappy, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, four claimant countries in dispute with China over the South China Sea, decided to meet in Manila on 12 December to discuss the issue without China.

The summit was a shining opportunity for Cambodia as chair of ASEAN to perform impartially, conforming to Article 1 of the country's Constitution: The Kingdom of Cambodia shall be independent, sovereign, peaceful, permanently neutral and non-aligned country.

Cambodia should have demonstrated respect for ASEAN member states' national interests to contribute toward the building of a more cohesive 2015 ASEAN Community. Facing US "pivot" or "rebalancing strategy" in Asia, especially South East Asia, ASEAN member states need to be united and protect each other's national interests, rather than siding with China or the US, to avoid jeopardizing ASEAN prosperity and harmony and endangering the region's peace.

Presently among ASEAN member states, Burma is on the road to reforms as she gradually breaks away from China, but Cambodia remains a subordinate to China, which finds Cambodia's vital geostrategic location to serve Beijing's national security in region. Beijing also needs Cambodia's natural resources for China's economic miracle.

On the other hand, Cambodia sees China as a vast dependable source of aid and loan, supposedly without strings; a huge market for Cambodia's economic growth; a super military power that can help Phnom Penh to have some influence, and undermine threats from neighboring countries. Cambodia sees China as her strong supporter on international stage.

But I am not convinced that Chinese aid and loan have no strings attached. As a saying goes, "there is no free lunch in the world". China needs Cambodia as a faithful subordinate to support and protect Beijing's national interests.

Geopolitically speaking, Cambodia's special strategic location is most desirable for China. In case of conflict with Vietnam, the S-shaped Vietnam can be easily attacked by land from Cambodia. Through water, China can use Sihanoukville, Kampong Som, Kompot and Koh Kong, and can straightforwardly access the Gulf of Thailand, the Straits of Malacca, and the Indian Ocean.

While Cambodia has faithfully opted for a One-China Policy, this policy has broadened its scope beyond Taiwan. Cambodia has supported China in almost all aspects of Chinese domestic and foreign policies. Thus, Cambodia forcibly deported 20 Uighur ethic asylum-seekers to China; pays no attention to the devastation, and suffering of Cambodian citizens, along the Mekong as a result of Chinese hydropower dams built in Yunnan province and on the Upper Mekong Basin; Cambodia supports China on the South China Sea dispute; and Phnom Penh ignores Chinese rights abuses.

A disadvantage of being too close to China is that it makes Cambodia's human rights and fledgling democracy worse. China is not interested in these matters so long as Cambodia serves China's interests.

As an impartial judiciary and the rule of law do not exist in Cambodia, a foreign direct investment (FDI) cannot be established. Democratic countries like Japan, America, Canada, Australia and the EU do not want to risk greater investments in Cambodia. Yet, many Chinese and Vietnamese people are in Cambodia, along with their investments.

Since 2006, Chinese companies have invested $8.2 billion; Vietnam has invested over $2 billion, according to the Vietnam-Laos-Cambodia Economic Co-operation Development Association. Conflicts with the local people have occurred due to land conflicts and environment issues, and the failure to respect the local people's rights.

As long as Cambodia is attached to China, Cambodia remains authoritarian. Burma's four decades of military rule witnessed Burma's violations of human rights, and a dictatorship ruled by military junta. Burma relied on China in many respects. For the Cambodian government, please don't do what Burma did!        

US President Thomas Jefferson said, public debt is the greatest of dangers to nation. Look! Cambodia has been heavily indebted to China and is trapped in indebtedness, with a long-term impact on Cambodian young generation.

As the US rearranges its 'pivot' in Asia, Cambodia has become an arena for US-China competition, geopolitically and ideologically.

Historically, Cambodia endured a bitter lesson when the US and the Soviet Union fought their proxy war in Indochina in the 1960s. We must work to remain non-aligned and balance the interests of today's super powers, the US and China. Plus, being so cohesively attached to China creates problems for ASEAN member states' team spirit and trustworthiness, making a commitment to ASEAN prosperity and harmony doubtful.

A colleague asked me if our government is not allied with China, where would Cambodia get money to run the government and to use for development. I replied, "I see many doable mechanisms to avoid being a Chinese subordinate".

The government needs to have a transparent and accountable tax policy. Tax the rich and wealthy classes who possess a large number of hectares of land, buildings, luxurious cars, lucrative private-sector businesses, land concessions, casinos and other alcohol-producing companies. And gradually government should also tax the middle class.

According to Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index in 2012, Cambodia was ranked 157/176 countries and scored: 22/100: corruption leads to many chronically critical social, economic, legal and political issues.

To avoid too much loans for national development, the government must fight corruption genuinely. In Cambodia, corruption is rampant in all levels of society. The jailed owner of Beehive Radio and president of the Democrats Association, Mam Sonando, once said he would give $100 to anyone who knows of any government ministry that is not corrupt. In an interview with the VOA in Khmer, Preab Kol, Executive Director of Transparency International in Cambodia, affirmed there are not enough prisons in Cambodia for the corrupt to stay in if they were arrested.

Establishing a transparent and trustworthy policy to fight corruption is a must. But make sure to avoid applying anti-corruption law discriminately.

The government must reduce the large number of advisors, undersecretaries and secretaries of state and council ministers. This will save a lot of money for the national budget. Then the government can use the money to develop prioritized sectors.            

Last but not least, Cambodia is rich in natural wealth. We have all kinds of trees, fishes, oil, minerals and others. They are priceless renewable and sustainable sources of economic development. Through effective and efficient management, we avoid loans from abroad.

The groundwork of any country's economic success comprises of an educated, healthy and employable citizens. To reach this goal, Cambodia needs to focus on agriculture and education.

The government needs a specific and long-term development plan on agriculture, industry and service. Cambodia needs to focus on agriculture for food grain sufficiency and on a basic principle of income for each household. Agriculture sector helps make strong economic households nationwide. It is imperative to focus on agriculture and to jump to industry and service.

Take one example. After independence in 1947, India was poor and lacked food grain supply for her people. In the late 1960s, the government started paying serious attention to agriculture by initiating what was called Green Revolution. Thanks to the Green Revolution, the government built a solid foundation of micro economy, generated income for the people, and India took another step toward industry and service sectors. Presently, the Indian people are thankful to the Green Revolution, which made India's industry and service booming. Basically, India has become food sufficient and the world's leading rice exporting country! Owing to the long-term impact of the Green Revolution, India's service sector is becoming the world's largest software exporting country to the US, Japan, Canada and the EU. An economic super power has been born.

Back to Cambodia, at the peak of the Arab spring, many Cambodians including a leader of opposition party flirted with Arab-style revolution as a mean to topple Premier Hun Sen and his one-party system in Cambodia. I begged to differ. I want no bloody revolution.

But I strongly wish to see Green Revolution in my country. Whenever I speak and write, I choose the peaceful approach to insist that my government should spend a large portion of the national budget on agriculture and education as the only way for poverty eradication and for sound industry and service sectors in the future.

Green revolution cultivates rice, provides high-yield seeds, doubles crops existing farmland and irrigation facilities. It also renovates the agro-industrial products like coffee, rubber plantation, cashews, cassava, silk, corn and food processing among others. Basically, it transforms the traditional and extensive agriculture to intensive and commercial agriculture with the help of research, development, and technology transfer initiatives.

Tourism is the main source of Cambodian economy. But tourism in Cambodia is just "cultural tourism" that depended only on temples like Angkor Wat and other cultural heritages. In this context, through Green Revolution, the Cambodian government could link up with tourism, and develop 'agri-tourism.' Through cultural tourism and agri-tourism, Cambodia would attract many more tourists than ever before.

Unfortunately, the projected 2013 national budget reveals Cambodia would spend only $35.3 million for agriculture sector, or one percent of the $3 billion budget; and only about $280 million for education sector.

Without paying attention to Cambodia's agriculture sector, more than 80% of Cambodian population will never be prosperous and can never break away from chronic poverty. The large number of Cambodian laborers will keep migrating to other countries like Thailand, Malaysia, South Korea and others for work.

..................
The AHRC is not responsible for the views shared in this article, which do not necessarily reflect its own.

About the Author:

Ou Ritthy is a graduate with a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Fergusson College, Pune University, India (2008-2011). He can be reached at ouritthy@socialworker.net / Twitter: @ritthyou.

CAMBODIA: Cambodian activists must believe in individuals’ capacity to accomplish the impossible — Asian Human Rights Commission

CAMBODIA: Cambodian activists must believe in individuals’ capacity to accomplish the impossible — Asian Human Rights Commission

Last week, a young political science graduate from a foreign university vented his frustrations in an e-mail from Cambodia at many Cambodian compatriots who don’t like to read. If they don’t read, they don’t learn. And if reading articles is painful, they certainly won’t read an entire book!
Initially, I planned to write about US President Barack Obama's visit to Cambodia, during which he reportedly spoke forcefully to Cambodian premier Hun Sen regarding the administration's abysmal record of human rights violations. But e-mails from Cambodians in the country and abroad reoriented my focus, hence, today's article.

Don't like to read

Last week, a young political science graduate from a foreign university vented his frustrations in an e-mail from Cambodia at many Cambodian compatriots who don't like to read. If they don't read, they don't learn. And if reading articles is painful, they certainly won't read an entire book!

He observed with frustration that there is no learning without reading, and life is not meaningful if one has no basis to compare, to understand, to improve. He dismissed suggestions that there is a dearth of reading material available in Cambodia. Cambodia, he said, lacks people who want to read.  Across the oceans I can sense his irritation– vexations of a young man who has put hours of hard work into a second language, to earn a degree from a reputable university. Now, back in his homeland, he is working to sensitize his relatives, friends, and colleagues to value education as a key to personal and national development. I have never met this young man. He sought me out through the Internet when he was a student. We discussed political socialization and political culture as he considered ways to bring about change to Cambodia's status quo and to better serve society.

Still young, must think of living longer

A few days ago, he wrote about the low price growers received for their rice harvest. This has negatively affected his parents' livelihood. As a result he may have to forego advanced studies and continue working so that his four siblings may finish their education in Cambodia.

Nevertheless, this young man remains committed to improving governance in Cambodia. To that end, he attended a recent workshop in Phnom Penh on the topic of governance and reform. He was disheartened by this meeting of "civil servants, military, police and royal armed forces" personnel. They rejected the need for adherence to the rule of law by a politically impartial police and military, blindly citing the regime's party line in support of that position. During the coffee break, some told him that he is an "extremist," that he is still "too young and still has a long time to live"; they advised him to be careful and live longer!

I have been made aware of this kind of threat and intimidation before – orchestrated accidents that take lives. Some incidents like the story of an armored vehicle from a security unit deliberately hitting a driver who had exited his vehicle at a security checkpoint.  The driver was hospitalized for three months as a result.  Other Cambodians relate stories of food poisoning and break-ins, among other violations.

Human Rights Watch published a 68-page report, Tell Them That I Want to Kill Them: Two Decades of Impunity in Hun Sen's Cambodia. It describes cases of unsolved killings of more than 300 political activists, journalists, opposition politicians, among others by Hun Sen's security forces since the 1991 Paris Peace Agreements. It identifies many senior Cambodian government officials involved in serious abuses and their current positions in the administration.

The report's title is said to be a quote from the then deputy-chief of Hun Sen's bodyguard, Hing Bun Heang. He answered a journalist's question about his reported role in the killing of 16 people in the 1997 hand grenade attack that wounded Sam Rainsy. Heang was promoted to lieutenant-general and is currently deputy commander-in-chief of the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces.

The report was released before Obama's trip to Cambodia. It called for systemic reforms.

Dislike politics, Love 'Thveu Bon'

At about the same time as my recent correspondence with the young graduate, an e-mail from a leader of a Cambodian non-governmental organization asked for my thoughts on an attitude she found to be prevalent among Khmers inside and outside the country. She wrote, many Khmers profess to dislike politics, an involvement they see as "scary." She said they prefer Thveu Bon, engaging in a religious ceremony to earn merit in this life in order to cross into a "beautiful next life"; and that the hardships and sufferings of the people are a product of karma that sufferers must endure. This way of thinking is, she asserts, an impediment to the creation of a dynamic society of citizens engaged in improving circumstances for everyone.

Misdirected political socialization, a stagnant political culture, and the unavailability of high quality education are among the elements that cause such beliefs and behaviors to proliferate.

Politics

Those who profess to dislike politics have themselves practiced politics throughout their lives. We all exercise political skills on a daily basis as we navigate through life.

In China, early Chinese settlers practiced politics 350,000 years ago! They migrated, organized, worked together, planned, and made decisions. This included the use of psychological and physical power, the development of effective procedures on the best ways to attain objectives and goals to keep their settlements safe and prosperous. Each person, each group, seeks to maximize his/her or its interests as s/he defines them. In general, the human person develops interests comprising good health, the meeting of economic needs, and a degree of contentment in life.

Politics refers to human activities in their interpersonal relationships to achieve targeted objectives and goals. There are family politics, peer group politics, office politics, pagoda politics, community politics, national politics and world politics.

When Cambodians, like many a people, say they "hate" politics, they usually mean the politics of government: They don't like demagoguery, demonization of opponents, corruption, cruelty, the accumulation of power, or the trampling of the rights of the less-privileged.

But didn't Lord Buddha teach against the "evils of the tongue" that humans practice? Didn't Buddha teach mankind to do all good, avoid all evil, and purify the mind?

There is an old saying, "You get the government you deserve." It means in a democracy, citizens can take actions to elect candidates they deem best to form a government to serve them, or citizens can remain inactive and get a government that doesn't serve them well.

Classical Greeks used the term politikos to describe the relationships between the citizens and their city state. In the 5th century, Athens emerged as the world's first democracy: demos means people, kratia means government – demokratia, a government of the people, by the people, for the people. Athens was built on the principle that citizens' free and well-informed participation in Athens' affairs was an honor and the duty of every citizen.

But as my young correspondent noted, without reading one does not learn about his/her own and his/her government's rights and duties.

It is worth recalling that when the French General, Charles de Gaulle entered politics, he declared, "I have come to the conclusion that politics is too serious a matter to be left to the politicians."

How "serious a matter" is politics? According to China's Mao Tse-tung, "Politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed." For England's Winston Churchill, "In war, you can only be killed once, but in politics, many times."

More than 2,000 years ago, Greek philosopher Plato (428B.C.-347B.C.) warned that, we would end up "being governed by those who are less intelligent" or "inferior" to ourselves if we refuse to participate in politics.

"Thveu Bon" for Next Life

I have written a great deal about politics and the teachings of Buddha. But learning requires a desire to both learn and unlearn. Without the motivation to learn, as the Khmer saying goes, Doch chak toek leu kbal tia – literally, it's like pouring water on a duck's head.

A former Khmer Buddhist monk, Bouawat Sithi, a graduate of Thailand's Djittabhawan College, affirmed time and again that Lord Buddha never taught humankind to believe in fate, but "to believe in our own action (karma)." He lamented that Buddha's teaching has been incorrectly taught and understood. This has led to the situation where many Cambodians have been overwhelmed with "egoism, anger, greed, delusion, desire, craving, hate and aversion."

"Nothing is permanent," Lord Buddha says, and he preaches, "Each morning we are born again. What we do today is what matters most." "I never see what has been done; I only see what remains to be done," Buddha says, and "We are what we think, with our thought we make the world." Men and women are masters of their own destiny.  We should be self-reliant and take responsibility for our own lives, Buddha urges, and "work out your own salvation."

Believe in ourselves?

In my last article I quoted from Cambodian Ou Ritthy's article, published by AHRC, about the Cambodians' habit of relying on foreigners to help solve problems. Politicians sit and talk "only when foreigners act as mediators," the government releases rights activists "only after foreigners . . . intervene." "Can't we, Cambodians, take these actions ourselves?" Ritthy asked.

Last week, Cambodian Pong Pheakdey Boramy's writing in Facebook and communication posted on the Internet, spoke of Cambodians' excitement to see President Obama. "He came, he came out of his airplane"! Boramy wrote: "What I learned is we actually do not rely and trust in ourselves . . . we do not trust ourselves but Obama . . . to help our country."

"Why do we not choose to be ourselves, to believe in ourselves?" Boramy asked. He referenced the Phnom Penh Post and other media outlets that reported "how people felt very disappointed when Obama did not say a word to give them (a) stimulus" upon departing from Cambodia.

In spite of the enormous problems that emanate from Cambodians' attitudes toward change, and from the lack of a broad-based quality education system, I conclude this article not pessimistically but positively because Cambodians have come a long way. Now there are increasing numbers who ask questions.  As we know, this is the first step in developing the capacity to think critically, analyze, and take action.  A questing mind is being developed.  It is late, yes, but better late than never.

The road ahead is still long and unknown. But if nothing is possible without human engagement, so I would like to think that nothing is impossible when men and women become engaged and develop the will and the imaginative creativity to achieve a goal.

……………..

The AHRC is not responsible for the views shared in this article, which do not necessarily reflect its own.
About the Author:Dr. Gaffar Peang-Meth is retired from the University of Guam, where he taught political science for 13 years. He currently lives in the United States. He can be reached at peangmeth@gmail.com.

Tuesday 11 December 2012

ADB Links Corruption, Political Culture

By - December 10, 2012

The government is beset with high-level corruption, a lack of transparency in public procurements, poor auditing practices and political interference in the country’s main anti-corruption body, a report produced by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) sent to the media yesterday states.


In a 66-page report that looks at how the government is managing its finances and fighting corruption, the ADB says that many of the country’s laws on public finances are simply not being implemented and that public procurement of goods and services needs to be improved at all levels of government, especially at a national level.

“Most aspects of governance need to recognize ongoing informal links between the dominant political party, medium-sized and large-sized businesses, and senior levels of government,” the ADB report, which was originally published in January, says.

“Furthermore, there is a limited tradition of accountability for performance through either financial oversight or political mechanisms.”

“Much of the public sector leakage that occurs in Cambodia is thought to occur in and around the systems applied in both domestically and externally financed procurement. Significant leakage is also thought to occur after the awarding of contracts, suggesting that contract management by executing agencies is weak and that penalties are seldom enforced,” the report continues.

The report also says that while corruption at lower levels of government appears to be decreasing, there is no such sign of such stabilization at higher levels of government.

“Corruption at all levels has long been regarded as the main area of concern for improving the business environment and overall governance in Cambodia, and this remains the case,” the report states.
The ADB also found that the main corruption risks likely to be experienced in the future by the government include “major challenges in building capacities in the new [Anti-Corruption Unit];” and “cultural constraints to questioning authority.”

“Though their ratings [in surveys of public opinion] have improved, the police, judges and courts, public registry, taxation, and customs, as well as the education system, continue to be perceived as the most corrupt institutions,” the report states.

Although the report notes that significant efforts have been made in the drafting of anti-corruption policy and the formation of the Anti-Corruption Unit (ACU), the ACU “has many challenges to overcome and it remains to be seen if it can become administratively and operationally effective.”

On the government’s management of finances, the ADB said that positive strides have been made in the past decade, but that progress in areas crucial to building investor confidence is still lacking. For example, the procurement process for government-funded projects still lacks transparency and regulations around procurement are insufficient and poorly enforced.

One reason for this is the fact that the Ministry of Economy and Finance acts as both a regulator and monitor in government procurement transactions.

“The need for greater transparency in public procurement is a common perception in Cambodia,” the report states.

“Also, there are suspicions (as yet not acted on) that some executing agency senior officials control some local consulting firms, who then tie up with foreign consulting firms when bidding on projects.”
The report also cites limited transparency in public projects due to few audits being carried out by the National Audit Authority (NAA).

“[O]nly around 50 percent of central government entities are covered by an external audit and the breadth of audit work undertaken within entities is limited.”

Still, the report says that the NAA “has made solid progress in recent years and, given its important strategic role in monitoring and managing governance risks, further ADB support in the years ahead is warranted.”
Vice president of the National Assembly Ngoun Nhel and Undersecretary of State at the Ministry of Finance Suong Mengkea both declined to comment on the ADB’s findings. Council of Ministers spokesman Phay Siphan referred questions to the Ministry of Finance.

Peter Brimble, country director for the ADB in Cambodia, said the report was meant as an indicator of where the country stands regarding financial management and where resources should be allocated as the country’s partnership with the ADB moves forward.

“No one is denying the need for major civil service reform,” Mr. Brimble said.
“The message is that we want to work with the government and strengthen country systems to go ahead in our partnership,” he added.

Mr. Brimble also noted that indicators of investor confidence in the country are improving despite the concerns over how the government handles its finances.

For instance, a January report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) announced that Cambodia’s debt distress level would be upgraded from moderate risk to low risk. Still, the IMF report also noted that for confidence in Cambodia to continue to grow, improvements had to be made to the country’s borrowing strategy and financial management systems.

A report released last week by Transparency International (T.I.), also concluded that Cambodia’s government has done little to shake its reputation for corruption.

In T.I.’s 2012 Corruption Perceptions Index, Cambodia ranked 157th among 176 countries and territories listed, with a score of just 22 out of 100—a slight improvement on last year’s ranking of 164.

(Additional reporting by Phorn Bopha)
© 2012, The Cambodia Daily. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced in print, electronically, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without written permission.

UN Says Information Ministry Decided to Halt Equity Weekly

By and - December 10, 2012

The U.N. Development Program (UNDP) said last month’s suspension of the “Equity Weekly” television program was uniquely due to a decision made by the Ministry of Information after the show aired a feature on economic land concessions in Ratanakkiri province.


“[T]he suspension was initially suggested by the Ministry of Information and agreed to by UNDP Cambodia,” a UNDP spokesperson said in an email.

“Equity Weekly,” which is broadcast every Sunday on the state-run channel TVK, funded by UNDP and aims at promoting good governance through investigative journalism, was taken off the air after the station received a complaint from the Ministry of Information announcing its displeasure over archive footage showing images of logging in the country.

“The decision was taken following a technical error in the identity of a portion of the footage used in a story related to the [Virachey] National Park in Ratanakkiri province. That portion of the footage was an archive but was not properly identified as such, which resulted in a misunderstanding,” the UNDP spokesperson said.

Environment Minister Mok Mareth confirmed that a letter he had sent to the Information Ministry had brought about the popular show’s suspension from broadcast.

“Yes, because if there’s wrong information, [there’s] no show,” Mr. Mareth said. “I wrote down the mistakes and sent it to the Ministry of Information,” which then informed TVK’s “Equity Weekly.”

Asked to comment on the government’s suspension of the show, Information Minister Khieu Kanharith referred a reporter to a letter his ministry had written to the UNDP.

“As for the letter, we unfortunately are unable to share with you as it is a formal correspondence addressed to UNDP specifically,” the UNDP spokesperson said.

On November 11, the last time “Equity Weekly” was broadcast, the host, Khem Vuthy, spent almost 25 minutes apologizing for the report made on September 30, which discussed the impacts of 50,000 hectares of economic land concessions used for rubber plantations in the Virachey National Park in Ratanakkiri—a province beset by land disputes and logging.

Ouy Bounmy, “Equity Weekly’s” senior producer, said that after the broadcast, he had to meet with Minister of Information Mr. Kanharith.

“Now it is just suspended. We are under discussion to improve reporting skills, because we don’t want to make or repeat the same mistakes again,” he said.

Spokesman for the Council of Ministers Phay Siphan said he did not believe that the show was suspended for its investigative journalism.

“This is not the government’s attitude. I know [Mr. Kanharith] very well and he wants to maintain different voices to be heard. There is no attitude to block free flow of ideas.”

© 2012, The Cambodia Daily. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced in print, electronically, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without written permission.

TV Program Halted After Government Criticism

By and - December 9, 2012

The U.N.-funded television program “Equity Weekly,” whose stated aim is to promote good governance through short investigative journalism pieces broadcast on state-run TVK, was suspended last month, the U.N. Development Program (UNDP) said.


The suspension of the popular show followed criticism from the government over the content of a recent feature on economic land concessions.

“It was a joint decision between the Ministry of Information and UNDP to temporarily suspend the ‘Equity Weekly’ show,” a spokesperson from the UNDP said in an email. “Several stories elicited strong reactions from the government and the general public.”

The UNDP did not say which stories in particular had spurred strong reaction from the government. The UNDP spokesperson said U.N. officials will be meeting with TVK soon to discuss the future of the program, funding for which will continue.

Broadcast for about 40 minutes every Sunday evening since 2007, “Equity Weekly’s” uncensored content is more hard-hitting by far than TVK’s closely vetted news content.

In their final broadcast, the host of “Equity Weekly,” Khem Vuthy, spent 25 minutes apologizing for a report made on September 30, which discussed the positive and negative effects of 50,000 hectares of economic land concessions shared by at least six private companies in the Virachey National Park in Ratanakkiri province.

“We would like to start the show with a correction. On our show aired on September 30, during our story about the alleged land concessions in the [Virachey] National Park, we failed to notify the viewers on the screen that some of the video used was archive footage from a different location,” Mr. Vuthy said.
“This was an unintentional error from our part and we apologize to all our viewers for the misunderstanding and confusion that this may have caused.”

Conservationists and human rights groups have strongly criticized the recent surge in land concessions in Ratanakkiri and elsewhere, saying that some plantations cut deep into Cambodia’s remaining pristine forests, while they also affect local farmland and the forest-based livelihoods of indigenous people.
During the last episode of the show on November 11, the host also announced that the Ministry of Information had sent TVK a five-page letter with a complaint from the Ministry of Environment over the Virachey National Park land concessions program.

“[It’s] an appropriate time to review [‘Equity Weekly’] and try to set new objectives to adapt to the fast changing media landscape in Cambodia. The UNDP has suggested to have a joint review taskforce between UNDP and TVK teams to review the production process and explore the best possible ways to move forward,” the UNDP spokesperson added.

A source working for the TV show, who spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity surrounding the show’s suspension, said that the contract between The UNDP and TVK to produce “Equity Weekly” programs runs until April 2013 and that staff will continue getting paid until then.
TVK Director-General Kem Gunawadh said that he had no knowledge of the matter.

“I did not hear about it yet because I received no information from [the] Ministry of Information,” he said.
Information Minister Khieu Kanharith could not be contacted for comment.

Ouy Bounmy, a senior producer for “Equity Weekly,” said the decision to cut the program had been made due to a scheduled break during the Asean Summit last month, as well as financial problems. He also said the suspension would only be temporary.

“[The suspension] is about funding shortage and we will resume in the next two weeks.”
Brian Lund, director of Oxfam America’s East Asia regional office, which is part of Oxfam International and also funds “Equity Weekly” alongside the UNDP, said he did not want to comment on the programming controversy.

“We are still supporting ‘Equity [Weekly]’ until April next year and probably beyond that because it is a valuable platform,” Mr. Lund said.

© 2012, The Cambodia Daily. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced in print, electronically, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without written permission.

EU Ambassador Says Listen to Envoy’s Advice



By - December 11, 2012

The European Union’s ambassador to Cambodia yesterday urged the government to heed the advice of the U.N.’s visiting human rights envoy, who has come under increasing rebuke from officials for his unflattering reports.


Addressing a crowd of about 3,000, mostly garment factory workers, at Phnom Penh’s Freedom Park to mark International Human Rights Day, E.U. Ambassador Jean-Francois Cautain spoke up for the work of the U.N.’s local human rights office and of the U.N.’s human rights envoy to the country, Surya Subedi.
“We believe the work of this office has contributed tremendously to the promotion and protection of human rights,” Mr. Cautain said of the U.N.’s human rights office in Cambodia.

“Similarly, the work of the U.N. special rapporteur, professor Subedi, who is here…in Cambodia, provides a unique opportunity for the government of Cambodia to receive expert recommendations for improving human rights,” he continued.

Government officials have recently stepped up their public criticism of Mr. Subedi, who arrived here on Sunday for his eighth fact-finding mission since taking up the unpaid post in 2009.
At least two officials, including the head of the government’s Human Rights Committee, Om Yentieng, have accused the U.N. envoy of effectively working for the political opposition. In October, Mr. Hun Sen referred to the envoy’s last report on the government’s highly controversial economic land concessions as “flimsy.”
The E.U. is currently reviewing Mr. Subedi’s report on land evictions in order to decide whether or not to launch its own investigation into possible human rights violations committed by Cambodia vis-a-vis free trade rules with Europe.

Also present at yesterday’s demonstration was the U.S. Embassy’s charge d’affaires, Jeff Daigle, who reminded the crowd of U.S. President Barack Obama’s visit to Cambodia last month, during which he pressed Mr. Hun Sen on the country’s deteriorating human rights record.
“Protecting human rights is essential to strong rule of law, civilian security, economic development and, ultimately, lasting peace,” Mr. Daigle said.

“This was a key message of President Obama during his visit to Cambodia last month, when he urged progress on these issues and stressed that the promise of Cambodia’s great people would only be realized when human rights are fully respected and all voices are heard,” Mr. Daigle added.
The U.S. president urged Mr. Hun Sen to create an independent election committee, let opposition parties work freely and release all political prisoners—including imprisoned radio station owner Mam Sonando.
Rights groups claim that the government has been regressing on its human rights record in recent years, increasingly using the police and courts to clamp down on dissenters and peaceful protesters.
In February, Bavet City governor Chhouk Bundith shot into a crowd of demonstrating garment workers, hitting three women, one through the lung. Though charged and implicated by eyewitnesses, the courts have made no attempt to arrest Mr. Bundith and could still drop the case.
Nuth Sokhorn, one of the women shot, allegedly by Mr. Bundith, reminded the crowds gathered at Freedom Park of the case.

“We are three women who were shot by Chhouk Bundith, who is still free. Please find justice for us,” she said, before breaking down in tears.
Thun Saray, president of local rights group Adhoc, said several government officials had been invited to the event, including Phnom Penh governor Kep Chuktema and Mr. Yentieng, but were told they would all be busy.

Police presence around the park was light. But just a few blocks away near the corner of Monivong and Russian boulevards, about 100 riot police officers blocked about as many anti-eviction activists from staging their own march to Mr. Hun Sen’s Peace Palace to deliver a petition requesting his help in their land disputes.
As the police confronted protesters, one police officer was seen knocking a female protester to the ground then kicking her in the abdomen. Once the protesters decided to disperse at about 10:30 a.m., police officers detained Nhep Ly, a community empowerment officer for the Housing Rights Task Force, for taking photographs.

Mr. Ly was taken to Srah Chak commune police headquarters in Daun Penh district but released soon after.
“The police accused me of taking pictures of the protest without asking permission in advance from authorities, but I told them that I just took pictures of the general activity like the other photographers,” he said after being released from custody.

Commune police chief Kan Vannak declined to comment on the violence and detention of Mr. Ly.
(Reporting by Aun Pheap, Khoun Narim, Phok Dorn and Zsombor Peter)
© 2012, The Cambodia Daily. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced in print, electronically, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without written permission.

Great Huangs of history

Time to invest in people

Tribunal betrays the ideal of justice

Cambodia's tax revenue totals $683 million

បុគ្គលិកកម្មករ​ឯកជន​នឹង​ទទួល​បាន​ប្រាក់​ចូល​និវត្តន៍​ដូច​មន្ត្រី​រាជការ

ពលករ​ខ្មែរ​ជាង​១៦​ម៉ឺន​នាក់​នៅ​ថៃ​ ត្រូវ​ប្រឈម​នឹង​ការ​និរទេស​មក​ស្រុក​វិញ

កម្ពុជា​អំពាវនាវ​ឲ្យ​កូរ៉េ​ខាង​ជើង​បញ្ឈប់​ការ​បាញ់​បង្ហោះ​មីស៊ីល

អ្នក​ជំនាញ​ថា​បារាំង​មិន​ដែល​កាត់​កោះត្រល់​ឲ្យ​​វៀតណាម​​

2012-12-10
សកម្មជន​ព្រំដែន​សច្ចា​ថា នឹង​នៅ​តែ​បន្ត​ទាមទារ​យក​កោះ​ត្រល់ របស់​ខ្មែរ ដែល​កំពុង​គ្រប់គ្រង​ដោយ​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​វៀតណាម សព្វ​ថ្ងៃ​នោះ មក​ជា​សម្បត្តិ​របស់​ខ្មែរ​វិញ​ឱ្យ​បាន ទោះ​ក្នុង​កាលៈទេសៈ ឬ​ត្រូវ​ប្រើ​រយៈពេល​យូរ​ប៉ុណ្ណា​ក៏ដោយ។

RFA/Uon Chhin
១៤-កញ្ញា-២០១២៖ កោះត្រល់


ពួកគេ​ចោទ​ប្រកាន់​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ទីក្រុង​ភ្នំពេញ បច្ចុប្បន្ន ថា​បាន​ធ្វើ​ឲ្យ​បាត់​កោះ​ដ៏​ធំ​របស់​ខ្មែរ​មួយ​នេះ។ ប៉ុន្តែ​មេដឹកនាំ​ខ្មែរ​តែង​អះអាង​ថា អាជ្ញាធរ​បារាំង បាន​កាត់​កោះ​នោះ​ទៅ​ឲ្យ​វៀតណាម ហើយ​បញ្ហា​ទាំង​នេះ​បាន​ចប់​សព្វគ្រប់​រួច​ទៅ​ហើយ។

ក្រុម​អ្នក​ជំនាញ​ខាង​កិច្ចការ​ព្រំដែន​ខ្មែរ​នៅ​ឯ​នាយ​សមុទ្រ​ប្រកាស​ថា បញ្ហា​កោះត្រល់​នៅ​តែ​ជា​បញ្ហា​ដែល​មិន​ទាន់​ចប់​សព្វ​គ្រប់​នោះ​ទេ សូម្បី​អតីត​ព្រះមហាក្សត្រ ព្រះបាទ នរោត្ត សុរាម្រិត និង​លោក​ទេសាភិបាល​បារាំង ប្រេវីយេ (Previer) ក៏​មិន​ដែល​កាត់​សេចក្ដី​ថា កោះ​ខ្មែរ​ដ៏​មាន​តម្លៃ​មិន​អាច​កាត់​ថ្លៃ​បាន​មួយ​នេះ ជា​កម្មសិទ្ធិ​ដាច់​មុខ​របស់​វៀតណាម នោះ​ដែរ។

ប្រធាន​គណៈកម្មាធិការ​ព្រំដែន​កម្ពុជា ដែល​មាន​មូលដ្ឋាន​ក្នុង​ប្រទេស​បារាំង លោក ស៊ាន ប៉េងសែ អះអាង​ថា បញ្ហា​កោះ​ត្រល់ គឺ​ជា​បញ្ហា​ជាតិ​ទាំង​មូល ហើយ​កោះ​មួយ​នេះ​ក៏​មិន​ដែល​ត្រូវ​បាន​សម្រេច​តាម​ផ្លូវ​ច្បាប់​ម្ដង​ណា​ឲ្យ ​ទៅ​វៀតណាម នោះ​ទេ។

ទាក់ទង​នឹង​បញ្ហា​កោះ​ត្រល់​នេះ លោក​នាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រី ហ៊ុន សែន នៅ​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​៩ ខែ​សីហា ឆ្នាំ​២០១២ បាន​ប្រកាស​ក្នុង​រដ្ឋ​សភា​ពី​មូលហេតុ​នាំ​ឲ្យ​កោះត្រល់​លែង​ជា​កម្មសិទ្ធិ​ របស់​ខ្មែរ​ថា ដោយសារ​តែ​ឯកសារ​ព្រះបាទ សម្ដេច​ព្រះ នរោត្ដម សីហនុ ដាក់​តម្កល់​នៅ​ក្នុង​អង្គការ​សហប្រជាជាតិ​នៅ​ឆ្នាំ​ ១៩៦៤ បាន​ទទួល​ស្គាល់​ខ្សែ​បន្ទាត់ ប្រេវីយេ ដែល​បាន​កាត់​កោះ​ត្រល់​ទៅ​ឱ្យ​ប្រទេស​វៀតណាម។

លោក ហ៊ុន សែន បញ្ជាក់​ថា ខ្មែរ​បាន​បាត់​កោះ​ត្រល់​របស់​ខ្លួន នៅ​ឆ្នាំ​១៩៣៩ ក្រោយ​ពី​អគ្គ​ទេសាភិបាល​ឥណ្ឌូចិន របស់​បារាំង លោក ប្រេវីយេ បាន​ដាក់​កោះ ត្រល់​ឲ្យ​ស្ថិត​នៅ​ក្រោម​ការ​គ្រប់គ្រង​ក្នុង​ដែនដី​កម្ពុជា​ក្រោម ឬ កូសាំងស៊ីន ហើយ​ឆ្នាំ​១៩៤៩ បារាំង​បាន​ ប្រគល់​ដែន​ដី​កូសាំងស៊ីន ដែល​ជា​ទឹក​ដី​កម្ពុជា​ក្រោម ទៅ​ឲ្យ​ព្រះចៅ​បៅដាយ នៃ​ប្រទេស​វៀតណាម។

ទោះ​ជា​យ៉ាង​ណា​ក៏ដោយ កាសែត​រស្មី​កម្ពុជា កាល​ពី​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​៥ ខែ​វិច្ឆិកា ឆ្នាំ​២០០៥ បាន​ដក​ស្រង់​បន្ទូល​របស់​អតីត​ព្រះមហាក្សត្រ ព្រះបាទ​សម្ដេច​ព្រះ នរោត្តម សីហនុ ចុះ​ផ្សាយ​ថា ព្រះអង្គ​មិន​ដែល​ទទួល​ស្គាល់​កោះ​ត្រល់ ជា​របស់​វៀតណាម ម្ដង​ណា​នោះ​ឡើយ។

រី​ឯ​ក្នុង​រជ្ជកាល​ព្រះរាជ​បិតា​របស់​ព្រះអង្គ គឺ​ព្រះបាទ នរោត្តម សុរាម្រិត អតីត​ព្រះមហាក្សត្រ​ខ្មែរ​អង្គ​នេះ ក៏​បាន​ចេញ​ព្រះរាជក្រឹត្យ​មួយ​ចុះ​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​៣០ ខែ​ធ្នូ ឆ្នាំ​១៩៥៧ ត្រាស់​បង្គាប់​ថា កោះ​ត្រល់ គឺ​ជា​កោះ​ដែល​ប្រទេស​ខ្មែរ​ដាក់​លក្ខខណ្ឌ​ថា ត្រូវ​រក្សា​ទុក​នូវ​សិទ្ធិ​ប្រវត្តិសាស្រ្ត។

ជាមួយ​គ្នា​នេះ​ផង​ដែរ នៅ​ឆ្នាំ​១៩៣៩ ទេសាភិបាល​បារាំង លោក ប្រេវីយេ បាន​សរសេរ​ជា​លាយលក្ខណ៍អក្សរ​កត់​ត្រា​ថា បារាំង​បាន​កំណត់​ចម្ងាយ​ប្រវែង ៣​គីឡូម៉ែត្រ​ពី​ខាង​ជើង​កោះ​ត្រល់ ត្រូវ​គ្រប់គ្រង​ដោយ​ប្រទេស​ខ្មែរ ហើយ​កោះ​ត្រល់​ត្រូវ​ស្ថិត​ក្រោម​ការ​គ្រប់គ្រង ដោយ​កូសាំងស៊ីន ឬ បារាំង។ ក៏​ប៉ុន្តែ​ការ​គ្រប់គ្រង​នេះ គ្រាន់​តែ​ជា​ការ​គ្រប់គ្រង​ផ្នែក​រដ្ឋបាល និង​តម្រួត​ប៉ុណ្ណោះ។ ចំណែក​ឯ​បញ្ហា​ទាក់ទង​រឿង​ភ្ជាប់​កោះ​ត្រល់​ទាំង​នេះ​ទៅ​ប្រទេស​ខ្មែរ ឬ កូសាំងស៊ីន​នោះ ត្រូវ​ទុក​មួយ​អន្លើ​សិន​ជា​ដាច់​ខាត។

លោក ស៊ាន ប៉េងសែ បាន​ចោទ​លោក​នាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រី ហ៊ុន សែន ថា មិន​ចេះ​ស្រឡាញ់​ជាតិ និង​ទឹក​ដី​របស់​ខ្លួន។ លោក​អំពាវនាវ​ឲ្យ​កូន​ខ្មែរ​គ្រប់​រូប​បន្ត​ការ​ទាមទារ​យក​ទឹក​ដី​របស់​ ខ្លួន​មក​វិញ ទោះ​ស្ថិត​ក្នុង​កាលៈទេសៈ​ណា​ក៏ដោយ។

កោះ​ត្រល់​មាន​ផ្ទៃ​ដី​សរុប ទំហំ ៥៤០​គីឡូម៉ែត្រ​ក្រឡា គឺ​ធំ​ជិត​ប៉ុន​ផ្ទៃ​ដី​ប្រទេស​សិង្ហបុរី (Singapore)។ កោះ​នេះ​ស្ថិត​នៅ​ចម្ងាយ ៥​គីឡូម៉ែត្រ ពី​កោះ​ក្រចកសេះ ហើយ​ចម្ងាយ ១៥​គីឡូម៉ែត្រ ពី​ឆ្នេរ​សមុទ្រ​ខ្មែរ​ភាគ​ខាង​ត្បូង និង​ ៤៥​គីឡូម៉ែត្រ ពី​ខេត្ត​ហាទៀន ប្រទេស​វៀតណាម។

អតីត​ប្រធាន​ចលនា​និស្សិត​ដើម្បី​លទ្ធិប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ លោក អ៊ុំ សំអាន ដែល​តែង​ដឹកនាំ​បាតុកម្ម​តវ៉ា​អំពី​បញ្ហា​បូរណភាព​ទឹក​ដី​ថ្លែង​ថា ទោះ​បី​បារាំង បាន​ដាក់​នឹម​អាណានិគម​លើ​ប្រទេស​ខ្មែរ​ពិត​មែន តែ​បារាំង មិន​ដែល​បាន​កាត់​ដែន​ដី​កោះ​មួយ​នេះ​ឲ្យ​ទៅ​ប្រទេស​វៀតណាម នោះ​ឡើយ។ លោក​បាន​ជំរុញ​ឲ្យ​មេដឹកនាំ​ខ្មែរ​គួរ​ទាមទារ​កោះ​ត្រល់​មក​វិញ តាម​រយៈ​ការ​ប្ដឹង​ទៅ​តុលាការ​យុត្តិធម៌​អន្តរជាតិ។
លោក អ៊ុំ សំអាន បញ្ជាក់​ថា ដោយសារ​តែ​កិច្ច​ព្រមព្រៀង​ឆ្នាំ​១៩៨២ រវាង​លោក ហ៊ុន សែន ជាមួយ​លោក ង្វៀង កូថាច់ រដ្ឋមន្ត្រី​ការបរទេស​វៀតណាម និង​សន្ធិសញ្ញា​បំពេញ​បន្ថែម​ឆ្នាំ​២០០៥ បាន​នាំ​ឲ្យ​កម្ពុជា បាត់បង់​ក្រោះ​ត្រល់ ដែល​មាន​តម្លៃ​កាត់​ថ្លៃ​ពុំ​បាន​នេះ។ លោក​បាន​ពន្យល់​ថា សន្ធិសញ្ញា​ទាំង​នេះ​ធ្វើ​ឡើង​ផ្ទុយ​ពី​រដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញ និង​កិច្ច​ព្រមព្រៀង​សន្តិភាព​ទីក្រុង​ប៉ារីស។

ចំណែក​សកម្មជន​ព្រំដែន​ដែល​មាន​មូលដ្ឋាន​ក្នុង​ប្រទេស​ន័រវ៉េ (Norway) លោក អៀរ ចាន់ណា ព្រមាន​ថា លោក ហ៊ុន សែន ត្រូវ​តែ​យក​កោះ​ត្រល់​នេះ​មក​ឲ្យ​ខ្មែរ​វិញ​ជា​ដាច់​ខាត បើ​ពុំ​នោះ​សោត​ទេ រដ្ឋាភិបាល​កម្ពុជា​បច្ចុប្បន្ន ត្រូវ​ទទួល​ខុស​ត្រូវ​ចំពោះ​មុខ​ប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រ​អំពី​ការ​បាត់បង់​កោះត្រល់ ចេញ​ពី​ផែនទី​ប្រទេស​កម្ពុជា។

រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ក្រុង​ហាណូយ កំពុង​បង្កើន​ល្បឿន​អភិវឌ្ឍន៍​យ៉ាង​ពេញ​ទំហឹង ដើម្បី​ធ្វើ​ឲ្យ​កោះ​ត្រល់ ដែល​ភាសា​វៀតណាម ហៅ​ថា «ភូកុក» ក្លាយ​ជា​តំបន់​ទេសចរណ៍ និង​ពាណិជ្ជកម្ម​លំដាប់​ពិភពលោក។ ក្រុមហ៊ុន​ទេសចរណ៍​ខ្លះ បាន​ហៅ​ឆ្នេរ​សមុទ្ទ​នៅ​កោះ​ត្រល់ ថា​ជា «ឆ្នេរ​សួគ៌ា»។
សព្វ​ថ្ងៃ​កោះ​ត្រល់ មាន​ជន​ជាតិ​វៀតណាម រស់​នៅ​ចំនួន​ជិត ១០​ម៉ឺន​នាក់ ក្នុង​នោះ​មាន​ផ្លូវ​ថ្នល់​ខ្វាត់ខ្វែង អគារ​រដ្ឋាភិបាល សាលារៀន មន្ទីរពេទ្យ សណ្ឋាគារ ភូមិ​គ្រឹះ អាគារ​លក់​ទំនិញ និង​ផ្សារ​ទំនើបៗ ព្រម​ទាំង​អាកាសយានដ្ឋាន​ខ្នាត​អន្តរជាតិ ១​កន្លែង និង​កំពង់ផែ​អន្តរជាតិ ៣​កន្លែង ដែល​ជា​មធ្យោបាយ​យ៉ាង​សំខាន់​ក្នុង​ការ​ពង្រីក​វិស័យ​ពាណិជ្ជកម្ម និង​ទេសចរណ៍។

ប្រជាជន​នៅ​ទី​នោះ​ឲ្យ​ដឹង​ថា រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ក្រុង​ហាណូយ បាន​ចំណាយ​ប្រាក់​ជាង ១​ពាន់​លាន​ដុល្លារ​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក សម្រាប់​អភិវឌ្ឍ​កោះ​ត្រល់នេះ៕

កម្ពុជា​បន្ត​បដិសេធ​មិន​ផ្ដល់​​កាដូ​ជូន​​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក


RFA/Vohar Cheath

ប្រធានាធិបតី​សហរដ្ឋ​អាមេរិក លោក បារ៉ាក់ អូបាម៉ា (ឆ្វេង) និង​លោក​នាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រី ហ៊ុន សែន ក្នុង​ជំនួប​នា​វិមាន​សន្តិភាព កាល​ពី​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​១៩ វិច្ឆិកា ឆ្នាំ​២០១២។



2012-12-10
រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ទីក្រុង​ភ្នំពេញ បាន​បដិសេធ​មិន​ផ្ដល់​​កាដូ​ពិសេស​ជូន​ប្រធានាធិបតី​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក លោក បារ៉ាក់ អូបាម៉ា (Barack Obama) ដែល​បាន​ទទូច​អង្វរ​សុំ​លោក​នាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រី ហ៊ុន សែន ឲ្យ​ដោះលែង​អ្នក​ទោស​នយោបាយ លើក​ស្ទួយ​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស និង​រៀបចំ​ការ​បោះឆ្នោត​ប្រកប​ដោយ​ស្តង់ដារ​អន្តរជាតិ។


ការ​ប្រកាស​មិន​ផ្ដល់​កាដូ​ជូន​សហរដ្ឋ​អាមេរិក​នេះ ធ្វើ​ឡើង​ស្រប​ពេល​ដែល​កម្ពុជា បាន​ទទូច​សុំ​កាដូ​ពី​សហរដ្ឋ​​​​អាមេរិក ដើម្បី​កាត់​បំណុល​ចាស់​របស់​កម្ពុជា។ អ្នក​វិភាគ​បាន​ព្រមាន​ថា កម្ពុជា​មិន​ត្រឹមតែ​មិន​បាន​ទទួល​កាដូ​ពី​សហរដ្ឋ​អាមេរិក​នោះ​ទេ ប៉ុន្តែ​ថែម​ទាំង​មាន​ផលវិបាក​ផ្នែក​ការទូត និង​វិនិយោគ​ទុន​រវាង​ប្រទេស​ទាំង​ពីរ​ទៀត​ផង ដោយសារ​តែ​កម្ពុជា បាន​ព្រងើយកន្តើយ និង​ផ្គើន នឹង​សំណើ​របស់​សហរដ្ឋ​អាមេរិក។

មន្ត្រី​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​កម្ពុជា បាន​បញ្ជក់​ជា​ថ្មី​ថា រដ្ឋាភិបាល​កម្ពុជា គ្មាន​កាដូ​អ្វី​ផ្ដល់​ជូន​ប្រធានាធិបតី​សហរដ្ឋ​អាមេរិក លោក ប៉ារាក់ អូបាម៉ា ទេ បើ​ទោះ​បី​លោក​ប្រធានាធិបតី​សហរដ្ឋ​អាមេរិក បាន​ស្នើ​សុំ​ឲ្យ​នាយករដ្ឋមន្រ្តី ហ៊ុន សែន រៀបចំ​ការ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​មួយ​ដោយ​សេរី និង​យុត្តិធម៌ ដោះ​លែង​អ្នក​ទោស​នយោបាយ និង​ធ្វើ​ឲ្យ​ស្ថានភាព​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​ប្រសើរ​ឡើង​វិញ​ក៏ដោយ។

អ្នក​នាំ​ពាក្យ​ទីស្តីការ​គណៈរដ្ឋមន្រ្តី លោក ផៃ ស៊ីផាន មាន​ប្រសាសន៍​ថា លោក ប៉ារាក់ អូបាម៉ា មិន​បាន​សំណូមពរ​ឲ្យ​កម្ពុជា ធ្វើ​តាម​ឡើយ ដោយ​លោក​គ្រាន់តែ​សំដែង​ក្តី​បារម្ភតែ​ប៉ុណ្ណោះ។
ការ​អះអាង​នេះ ផ្ទុយ​ទៅ​នឹង​ព័ត៌មាន​របស់​មន្ត្រី​សេតវិមាន ដែល​បាន​ប្រាប់​អ្នក​សារព័ត៌មាន​ថា ក្នុង​ជំនួប​តានតឹង​មួយ​រវាង​លោក ហ៊ុន សែន និង​លោក ប៉ារាក់ អូបាម៉ា កាល​ពី​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​១៩ វិច្ឆិកា លោក​ប្រធានាធិបតី​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក បាន​និយាយ​នឹង​លោក ហ៊ុន សែន ដោយ​ទឹក​មុខ​មាំ មិន​ញញឹម​ថា បញ្ហា​ការ​រំលោភ​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស នឹង​ក្លាយ​ជា​ឧបសគ្គ​រារាំង​ទំនាក់​ទំនង​រវាង​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក និង​កម្ពុជា មិន​ឲ្យ​ស៊ី​ជម្រៅ​បាន។ ប៉ុន្តែ​រយៈពេល​ជាង​ពីរ​សប្ដាហ៍​កន្លង​ផុត​ទៅ​ហើយ រដ្ឋាភិបាល​លោក ហ៊ុន សែន នៅ​មិន​ទាន់​បាន​ឆ្លើយ​តប​ជា​វិជ្ជមាន​នៅ​ឡើយ។

រដ្ឋាភិបាល​លោក ហ៊ុន សែន ហាក់​បី​កំពុង​លែង​ល្បែង​នឹង​សហរដ្ឋ​អាមេរិក​ក្នុង​ការ​ដោះ​ដូរ​កាដូ​ទៅ​វិញ ​ទៅ​មក។ ក្នុង​ជំនួប​តឹង​សរសៃ​ក​នោះ​ដែរ លោក ហ៊ុន សែន បាន​សុំ​ឲ្យ​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក លុប​បំណុល​ចាស់​ចោល និង​ពង្រឹង​ទំនាក់ទំនង​ល្អ​នឹង​កម្ពុជា នៅ​ពេល​ដែល​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​កំពុង​ចាប់​អ្នក​ប្រឆាំង និង​អ្នក​សារព័ត៌មាន​ដាក់​ពន្ធនាគារ និង​បាន​បដិសេធ​មិន​ឆ្លើយ​តប​ជា​វិជ្ជមាន​នឹង​សំណើ​របស់​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក។

ក្នុង​សន្និសីទ​សារព័ត៌មាន​មួយ​ក្រោយ​ពី​ជំនួប​លោក បារ៉ាក់ អូបាម៉ា និង​លោក ហ៊ុន សែន រដ្ឋលេខាធិការ​ទីស្ដីការ​គណៈរដ្ឋមន្ត្រី លោក ប្រាក់ សុខុន បាន​ប្រាប់​អ្នក​សារព័ត៌មាន​ថា លោក ហ៊ុន សែន បាន​សុំ​កាដូ​ពិសេស​ពី​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក។ លោក​បន្ត​ថា លោក ហ៊ុន សែន បាន​សុំ​លោក បារ៉ាក់ អូបាម៉ា បង្វែរ​បំណុល​ចាស់​ចំនួន​ជាង ៤០០​លាន​ដុល្លារ​ទៅ​ជួយ​សង្គម និង​វិស័យ​អប់រំ និង​នៅ​សេស​សល់​ប៉ុន្មាន​ទៀត កម្ពុជា​នឹង​សង ប៉ុន្តែ​ត្រូវ​គិត​ការ​ប្រាក់​ក្នុង​កម្រិត​ទាប។ លោក ប្រាក់ សុខុន បន្ត​ថា លោក ហ៊ុន សែន ក៏​បង្ហាញ​បំណង​ចង់​រឹត​ចំណង​កិច្ច​សហការ​នឹង​សហរដ្ឋ​អាមេរិក​ផង​ដែរ។
អ្នក​វិភាគ​ឯករាជ្យ​បាន​ឲ្យ​ដឹង​ថា កម្ពុជា​ត្រូវ​ការ​កាដូ និង​ការ​គាំទ្រ​ច្រើន​ពី​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក ប៉ុន្តែ​ហាក់​មិន​ចង់​ផ្ដល់​កាដូ​ឲ្យ​សហរដ្ឋ​អាមេរិក​វិញ។ ទង្វើ​នេះ ប្រហែល​ជា​បណ្ដាល​ឲ្យ​កម្ពុជា ខាត​បង់​ច្រើន។
លោក​បណ្ឌិត ឡៅ ម៉ុងហៃ បាន​ព្រមាន​ថា ការ​មិន​ព្រម​ធ្វើ​តាម​សំណូមពរ​របស់​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក នឹង​ផ្ដល់​ផលវិបាក​សម្រាប់​កម្ពុជា ក្នុង​ទំនាក់​ទំនង​ការទូត​រវាង​ប្រទេស​ទាំង​ពីរ។ លោក​បន្ត​ថា បច្ចុប្បន្ន​មិន​មែន​តែ​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក​ទេ ដែល​បាន​សំដែង​ក្តី​កង្វល់​ពី​ការ​រំលោភ​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស និង​ការ​រៀបចំ​ការ​បោះឆ្នោត​នៅ​កម្ពុជា ប្រទេស​អូស្ត្រាលី ហ្វីលីពីន និង​សហភាព​អឺរ៉ុប ក៏​បាន​សំដែង​ក្តី​កង្វល់​ផង​ដែរ។
លោក​ថា ប្រសិន​បើ​គ្មាន​ការ​រៀបចំ​ការ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​ដោយ​សេរី និង​យុត្តិធម៌ ដោយ​​​មាន​ការ​ចូល​រួម​របស់​ប្រធាន​គណបក្ស​សង្គ្រោះ​ជាតិ លោក សម រង្ស៊ី នោះ​ទេ ប្រទេស​ទាំង​នោះ​ប្រហែល​ជា​មិន​ទទួល​ស្គាល់​លទ្ធផល​នៃ​ការ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​ឡើយ។ ផល​លំបាក​ផ្សេង​ទៀត គឺ​អាច​កើត​ឡើង​ក្នុង​វិស័យ​វិនិយោគទុន​របស់​កម្ពុជា ដោយសារ​កម្ពុជា ត្រូវ​ការ​ទីផ្សារ​នៅ​សហរដ្ឋ​អាមេរិក និង​អឺរ៉ុប សម្រាប់​វិស័យ​កាត់ដេរ និង​ផលិតកម្ម​កសិកម្ម​មួយ​ចំនួន​ទៀត។

ចំណែក​សភាសហភាព​អឺរ៉ុប និង​ព្រឹទ្ធ​សភា​អូស្ត្រាលី និង​ហ្វីលីពីន ក៏​បាន​សំណូមពរ​ឲ្យ​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​កម្ពុជា អនុវត្ត​នូវ​គោលការណ៍​នីតិរដ្ឋ​ឲ្យ​បាន​ត្រឹមត្រូវ​ផង​ដែរ។ ប្រទេស​ទាំង​នោះ​ចង់​ឃើញ​លោក សម រង្ស៊ី ប្រធាន​គណបក្ស​សង្គ្រោះ​ជាតិ អាច​ចូល​រួម​ការ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​សកល​នៅ​ឆ្នាំ​២០១៣ ខាង​មុខ ដើម្បី​មាន​ការ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​មួយ​ប្រព្រឹត្ត​ឡើង​ដោយ​សេរី យុត្តិធម៌ និង​សហគមន៍​អន្តរជាតិ​អាច​ទទួល​យក​បាន។

នាយក​រង​ទទួល​បន្ទុក​កិច្ចការ​តំបន់​អាស៊ី​នៃ​អង្គការ​ឃ្លាំមើល​សិទ្ធិ​ មនុស្ស​អន្តរជាតិ (Human Rights watch) លោក ហ្វៀល រ៉ូបឺតសុន (Phil Robertson) កាល​ពី​សប្ដាហ៍​មុន​បាន​ទទូច​ឲ្យ​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​កម្ពុជា ឆ្លើយ​តប​ដោយ​វិជ្ជមាន​ទៅ​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក ប៉ុន្តែ​ក៏​បាន​ស្នើ​សុំ​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក បន្ត​ជំរុញ​ឲ្យ​កម្ពុជា អនុវត្ត​នីតិរដ្ឋ។ លោក​បន្ត​ថា ការ​ចាប់​អ្នក​សារព័ត៌មាន លោក ម៉ម សូណង់ដូ និង​ពលរដ្ឋ​ដាក់​គុក ជា​ទង្វើ​មិន​អាច​ទទួល​យក​បាន ហើយ​ការ​ដែល​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ត្រួតត្រា​បណ្ដាញ​ព័ត៌មាន និង​ការ​រៀបចំ​ការ​បោះឆ្នោត គឺ​កាន់​តែ​មិន​អាច​ទទួល​យក​បាន។

លោក ហ្វៀល រ៉ូបឺតសុន បន្ត​ថា សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក​ត្រូវ​តែ​តាម​ដាន​បន្ត​ទៀត​ចំពោះ​សំណើ​របស់​ខ្លួន៖ «គ្មាន ​នរណា​ម្នាក់​រំពឹង​ថា លោក ហ៊ុន សែន ធ្វើ​តាម​សំណើ​របស់​លោក អូបាម៉ា នោះ​ទេ។ បញ្ហា​នេះ​ទាមទារ​ឲ្យ​មាន​កិច្ច​ខំ​ប្រឹងប្រែង​បន្ថែម​ទៀត។ វា​ទាមទារ​ឲ្យ​លោក អូបាម៉ា និង​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​សហរដ្ឋ​អាមេរិក ជំរុញ​ឲ្យ​ខ្លាំងក្លា​បន្ថែម​ទៀត។ វា​ជា​រឿង​ធម្មតា​ណាស់​សម្រាប់​កម្ពុជា ក្នុង​ការ​ឆ្លើយ​តប គឺ​កម្ពុជា​ត្រូវ​ដោះ​លែង​លោក ម៉ម សូណង់ដូ និង​អនុញ្ញាត​ឲ្យ​លោក សម រង្ស៊ី វិល​មក​កម្ពុជា​វិញ»
លោក ហ្វៀល រ៉ូបឺតសុន​ បន្ថែម​ទៀត​ថា ថ្វី​ដ្បិតតែ​សំណើ​សហរដ្ឋ​អាមេរិក​ងាយ​ស្រួល​ឆ្លើយ​តប ប៉ុន្តែ​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ទីក្រុង​ភ្នំពេញ មិន​បាន​បង្ហាញ​ឆន្ទៈ​នយោបាយ​ពិត​ប្រាកដ​ណា​មួយ ដោះស្រាយ​បញ្ហា​នេះ​ឡើយ។ ទស្សនកិច្ច​របស់​លោក បារ៉ាក់ អូបាម៉ា ជា​ទស្សនកិច្ច​ប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រ​របស់​ប្រធានាធិបតី​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក​លើក​ដំបូង​ មក​កម្ពុជា។

លោក បារ៉ាក់ អូបាម៉ា ជា​ប្រធានាធិបតី​ជាប់​ឆ្នោត​ពីរ​អាណត្តិ ប៉ុន្តែ​លោក ហ៊ុន សែន បាន​កាន់​អំណាច​ចាប់​តាំង​ពី​ឆ្នាំ​១៩៨៥ ហើយ​ប្រកាស​បន្ត​កាន់​កាប់​តំណែង​របស់​លោក​ដល់​អាយុ ៩០​ឆ្នាំ។ អ្នក​ប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រ​ចាត់​ទុក លោក ហ៊ុន សែន ថា ជា​មនុស្ស​ឆ្លាត ជា​អ្នក​ប្រយុទ្ធ​ប្រកប​ដោយ​ល្បិចកល។ លោក ហ៊ុន សែន ត្រូវ​បាន​ផ្ដល់​ងារ​ជា “បុរស​ខ្លាំង​នៅ​កម្ពុជា”។

ក្នុង​រយៈពេល​ប៉ុន្មាន​ឆ្នាំ​ចុង​ក្រោយ​នេះ ទំនាក់ទំនង​ការទូត​រវាង​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក និង​កម្ពុជា ហាក់​ពុំ​មាន​ភាព​ប្រសើរ​ឡើយ។ កាល​ពី​ដើម​ឆ្នាំ​២០០៦ សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក​បាន​អន្តរាគមន៍​លោក ហ៊ុន សែន ឲ្យ​ដោះលែង​អ្នក​រិះគន់​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ចំនួន ៤​នាក់ រួម​មាន​អតីត​ប្រធាន​មជ្ឈមណ្ឌល​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​កម្ពុជា លោក កឹម សុខា លោក ម៉ម សូណង់ដូ នាយក​វិទ្យុ​សំបុកឃ្មុំ លោក រ៉ុង ឈុន ប្រធាន​សមាគម​គ្រូ​បង្រៀន​កម្ពុជា​ឯករាជ្យ និង​ប្រធាន​វិទ្យុ​សំឡេង​ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ លោក ប៉ា ងួនទៀង។

ក្រោយ​ពី​ជំនួប​មិន​បើក​ចំហ​មួយ​រវាង​ឧបការី​ក្រសួង​ការបរទេស​សហរដ្ឋ​ អាមេរិក លោក គ្រីស្តូហ្វឺ ហ៊ីល (Christopher Hill) និង​លោក ហ៊ុន សែន រដ្ឋាភិបាល​កម្ពុជា បាន​សម្រេច​ដោះលែង​អ្នក​រិះគន់​ទាំង ៤​នាក់​នោះ ឱ្យ​នៅ​ក្រៅ​ឃុំ​ជា​បណ្ដោះអាសន្ន។ សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក​ក៏​ធ្លាប់​បាន​ផ្អាក​ជំនួយ​យោធា​ដល់​កម្ពុជា ក្រោយ​ពេល​ដែល​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​សម្រេច​ចាប់​បញ្ជូន​ជន​ភៀស​ខ្លួន​អ៊ុយហ្គឺរ៍ ចំនួន ២០​នាក់​ទៅ​ឲ្យ​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ចិន កាល​ពី​ឆ្នាំ​២០០៩។

អ្នក​វិភាគ និង​មន្ត្រី​អង្គការ​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​នៅ​តែ​សំណូមពរ​ឲ្យ​កម្ពុជា ផ្ដល់​កាដូ​ដល់​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក ប្រសិន​បើ​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ត្រូវ​ការ​កាដូ​ពី​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក​វិញ​នោះ៕

Monday 10 December 2012

Obama Visits China-Tilting Cambodia

Obama Visits China-Tilting Cambodia

Authoritarian Hun Sen plays the US off China, but the US takes long-term view
Sebastian Strangio
YaleGlobal, 7 December 2012
Cambodia in the middle: President Barack Obama extends a limp hand to Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen (top); happier relations with China’s Premier Wen Jiabao
PHNOM PENH: If body language is any predictor, President Barack Obama did not enjoy his short trip to Cambodia to attend the recent East Asia Summit. The unsmiling president joined routines with other participating heads of governments his visit aimed at winning friends and influencing others against a rising China. Still, long-term US involvement in the country’s economy and security may yet produce results.
Before the summit, Obama met privately with summit host, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, 60, and chided him on human rights issues, including recent land seizures, jailed political dissenters and the need for next year’s national elections to be free and fair. The meeting was described as “tense.” According to an aide who briefed reporters, Obama contrasted Cambodia’s authoritarian creep with Burma’s moves towards reform, warning that human rights abuses could be an impediment to a “deeper relationship with the United States.”
Obama’s visit to Cambodia, the first by a sitting US president, was preceded by calls for him to publicly address human rights. A Human Rights Watch report released before the trip recounted the unsolved killings of around 300 labor leaders, journalists, and opposition leaders during Hun Sen’s 27-year rule. Local activists also highlighted the self-exile of opposition leader Sam Rainsy on what many say are trumped-up charges and a recent crackdown on government critics and residents protesting forced evictions.
Obama seemed to stake out a middle way on human rights, discussing them behind closed doors but maintaining public silence.
Observing Obama’s chilly visit, Don Jameson, a former diplomat who served at the US Embassy in Phnom Penh in the early 1970s, said Obama seemed to stake out a middle way on human rights, discussing them behind closed doors but maintaining a public silence, possibly an effort to assuage  activists who criticized him for making the stop in Cambodia at all. Jameson observed that the remarks’ impact was limited to the international press. Domestically, Hun Sen basked in the legitimacy conferred by Obama’s visit; human rights issues received little coverage in the government-aligned press. “As long as he has China on his side,” Jameson said, “Hun Sen seems confident that he can weather any storm and does not need to be concerned about what the US thinks.”

Not far from the Peace Palace, protesters released balloons and signs with the international distress signal, SOS, and small photos of Obama.

Lao Mong Hay, a Phnom Penh–based rights activist, welcomed the president’s comments to Hun Sen, expressing hope that they might lead to new emphasis on human rights. “Cambodia cannot afford to have strained relations with the United States,” he said, adding that the country relies on the US as an export market for its garments, giving the US “strategic leverage.” In 2011, according to the Garment Manufacturers Association in Cambodia, the country exported $2.06 billion worth of garments and textiles to the US, more than half of its total; the industry employs an estimated 350,000 workers. Cambodia’s garment exports to the US also make up a massive proportion over its overall exports, which totaled $4.87 billion last year. This stands in contrast to the wide trade deficit with China. In 2011, the $2.5 billion in two-way trade between Cambodia and China consisted overwhelmingly of imports of Chinese machinery, electronics, food, cars and medicines.

Cambodia relies on the US as an export market for garments, more than half that industry’s total, giving the US “strategic leverage.”
Whether the US chooses to use its leverage remains an open question. Obama’s landmark trip to Asia was a key step in Washington’s much-vaunted pivot toward Asia, an effort to bolster military, economic and political relationships as a counterweight to China’s rising influence in the region. Over the past decade, China has poured billions of dollars of “no-strings attached” loans and investments into Cambodia, transforming its physical infrastructure and reducing its dependence on Western development assistance tied to democratic and good governance reforms
In return, Cambodia does China’s bidding on a range of issues. It has deported to China Uighur asylum seekers, given vocal support to the One-China Policy and backed China’s position on negotiations over the South China Sea dispute. Two large green banners welcomed visiting dignitaries to Phnom Penh’s Peace Palace for the summit meetings, listing one leader and one country: “Welcome Prime Minister Wen Jiabao!” proclaimed one banner. “Long Live the People’s Republic of China!” read the other.
Hun Sen has played this game for years. US-Cambodia relations have steadily improved since July 1997, when he overthrew co–prime minister, Prince Norodom Ranariddh, in a violent coup de force. But as Hun Sen consolidated power in the early 2000s, Washington began to reengage. In August 2005, restrictions on US military assistance to Cambodia were lifted; in 2007, the US resumed direct foreign assistance, making Cambodia the third largest recipient of US aid in East Asia after Indonesia and the Philippines. This renewed commitment was symbolized by the December 2005 inauguration of a new $47 million US Embassy complex in Phnom Penh.

Then came the Obama administration’s pivot to Asia. In 2009, Cambodia and the US exchanged defense attachés, and Defense Minister Tea Banh visited Washington for talks about building up ties between the US military and the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces (RCAF). Angkor Sentinel, an annual joint US-Cambodian military exercise, was inaugurated in 2010, and three days before Obama’s arrival last week, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta met with Tea Banh in Siem Reap and reaffirmed US military commitment to Cambodia.

According to Carl Thayer, the US is building relationships with those considered to have influence now and in the future.
Carl Thayer, a professor at the Australia Defense Forces Academy in Canberra, said that despite the lack of any real terrorist threat in Cambodia today, counterterrorism and defense cooperation allows the US to preserve a measure of influence as the country moves further into China’s orbit. “The US has an ‘in’ on the security and defense side that China really does not have,” he said. “Since [counterterrorism] is an already existing program it would have normative approval in the United States as a place to go, to keep some avenues of American influence open.”
Casting its eye to the longer term, the US also moves to establish strong relationships with Hun Sen’s eldest son and heir apparent. Hun Manet was given a place at West Point military academy, graduating in 1999. The 35-year-old is a RCAF major-general and commands the National Counter-Terrorism Special Force established with US assistance in 2008.

In August, at the close of Vector Balance Canoe, another joint military exercise, US Ambassador William E. Todd singled out Manet for his “outstanding job as the commanding officer of such a fine unit,” and reiterated that “America has been committed to Cambodia, is committed to Cambodia now, and will be committed to Cambodia long into the future.” Describing Manet as “a rising future star,” Thayer notes, “America’s very carefully building up relationships with people who are considered to have influence now, and are likely to have even greater influence in future.”

The chilly visit may strain relations, but in the long-run, the two countries will likely see benefits of closer ties. For the US, there is the need to offset a rising China, forcing the former to take a patient approach on human rights issues. For Cambodia, as always, there is the weight of history as a small nation vulnerable to powerful outside forces. It may be that as China’s influence grows Hun Sen will recall an adage often cited by Prince Norodom Sihanouk as he struggled to maintain Cambodia’s neutrality during the Cold War: “When two elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers.” In the end, the economic and military weight of the US may persuade Hun Sen and his successors to slide towards a more balanced position.
Sebastian Strangio is a journalist based in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, covering Asia.

Official Resume of H.E. Dr. SAR Sokha, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister (April 2024)

    CURRICULUM VITAE   1.            Surname - Given Name :    SAR SOKHA   7.            FAMILY STATUS: a.        Spouse: KE SOUNSO...